Literature DB >> 18043871

Structure discrimination for the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli trigger factor in solution.

Yong Yao1, Gira Bhabha, Gerard Kroon, Mindy Landes, H Jane Dyson.   

Abstract

NMR measurements can give important information on solution structure, without the necessity for a full-scale solution structure determination. The C-terminal protein binding domain of the ribosome-associated chaperone protein trigger factor is composed of non-contiguous parts of the polypeptide chain, with an interpolated prolyl isomerase domain. A construct of the C-terminal domain of Escherichia coli trigger factor containing residues 113-149 and 247-432, joined by a Gly-Ser-Gly-Ser linker, is well folded and gives excellent NMR spectra in solution. We have used NMR measurements on this construct, and on a longer construct that includes the prolyl isomerase domain, to distinguish between two possible structures for the C-terminal domain of trigger factor, and to assess the behavior of the trigger factor C-terminal domain in solution. Two X-ray crystal structures, of intact trigger factor from E. coli (Ferbitz et al., Nature 431:590-596, 2004), and of a truncated trigger factor from Vibrio cholerae (Ludlam et al., Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:13436-13441, 2004) showed significant differences in the structure of the C-terminal domain, such that the two structures could not be superimposed. We show using NMR chemical shifts and long range nuclear Overhauser effects that the secondary and tertiary structure of the E. coli C-terminal domain in solution is consistent with the crystal structure of the E. coli trigger factor and not with the V. cholerae protein. Given the similarity of the amino acid sequences of the E. coli and V. cholerae proteins, it appears likely that the structure of the V. cholerae protein has been distorted as a result of truncation of a 44-amino acid segment at the C-terminus. Analysis of residual dipolar coupling measurements shows that the overall topology of the solution structure is completely inconsistent with both structures. Dynamics analysis of the C-terminal domain using T1, T2 and heteronuclear NOE parameters show that the protein is overall rather flexible. These results indicate that the structure of this domain in solution resembles the X-ray crystal structure of the E. coli protein in secondary structure and at least some tertiary contacts, but that the overall topology differs in solution, probably due to structural fluctuation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18043871     DOI: 10.1007/s10858-007-9207-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol NMR        ISSN: 0925-2738            Impact factor:   2.835


  24 in total

1.  Chaperone binding at the ribosomal exit tunnel.

Authors:  Ole Kristensen; Michael Gajhede
Journal:  Structure       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.006

2.  NMR solution structure and dynamics of the peptidyl-prolyl cis-trans isomerase domain of the trigger factor from Mycoplasma genitalium compared to FK506-binding protein.

Authors:  Martin Vogtherr; Doris M Jacobs; Tatjana N Parac; Marcus Maurer; Andreas Pahl; Krishna Saxena; Heinz Rüterjans; Christian Griesinger; Klaus M Fiebig
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 5.469

3.  Prediction of charge-induced molecular alignment of biomolecules dissolved in dilute liquid-crystalline phases.

Authors:  Markus Zweckstetter; Gerhard Hummer; Ad Bax
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 4.033

4.  The crystal structure of ribosomal chaperone trigger factor from Vibrio cholerae.

Authors:  Anthony V Ludlam; Brian A Moore; Zhaohui Xu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2004-09-07       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Trigger factor in complex with the ribosome forms a molecular cradle for nascent proteins.

Authors:  Lars Ferbitz; Timm Maier; Holger Patzelt; Bernd Bukau; Elke Deuerling; Nenad Ban
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2004-08-29       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Estimating the accuracy of protein structures using residual dipolar couplings.

Authors:  Katya Simon; Jun Xu; Chinpal Kim; Nikolai R Skrynnikov
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 2.835

7.  Prolyl isomerases in a minimal cell. Catalysis of protein folding by trigger factor from Mycoplasma genitalium.

Authors:  H Bang; A Pecht; G Raddatz; T Scior; W Solbach; K Brune; A Pahl
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  2000-06

8.  NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes.

Authors:  F Delaglio; S Grzesiek; G W Vuister; G Zhu; J Pfeifer; A Bax
Journal:  J Biomol NMR       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.835

9.  Backbone dynamics of a free and phosphopeptide-complexed Src homology 2 domain studied by 15N NMR relaxation.

Authors:  N A Farrow; R Muhandiram; A U Singer; S M Pascal; C M Kay; G Gish; S E Shoelson; T Pawson; J D Forman-Kay; L E Kay
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1994-05-17       Impact factor: 3.162

10.  Escherichia coli trigger factor is a prolyl isomerase that associates with nascent polypeptide chains.

Authors:  T Hesterkamp; S Hauser; H Lütcke; B Bukau
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1996-04-30       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  8 in total

1.  Flexibility of the bacterial chaperone trigger factor in microsecond-timescale molecular dynamics simulations.

Authors:  Andrew S Thomas; Suifang Mao; Adrian H Elcock
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Trigger factor finds new jobs and contacts.

Authors:  Anja Hoffmann; Bernd Bukau
Journal:  Nat Struct Mol Biol       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 15.369

Review 3.  A Review: Molecular Chaperone-mediated Folding, Unfolding and Disaggregation of Expressed Recombinant Proteins.

Authors:  Komal Fatima; Fatima Naqvi; Hooria Younas
Journal:  Cell Biochem Biophys       Date:  2021-02-25       Impact factor: 2.194

4.  Structural basis for protein antiaggregation activity of the trigger factor chaperone.

Authors:  Tomohide Saio; Xiao Guan; Paolo Rossi; Anastassios Economou; Charalampos G Kalodimos
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 47.728

5.  The dynamic dimer structure of the chaperone Trigger Factor.

Authors:  Leonor Morgado; Björn M Burmann; Timothy Sharpe; Adam Mazur; Sebastian Hiller
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 14.919

6.  Trigger Factor in Association with the ClpP1P2 Heterocomplex of Leptospira Promotes Protease/Peptidase Activity.

Authors:  Madhurima Choudhury; Anusua Dhara; Manish Kumar
Journal:  ACS Omega       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Hydrophobic collapse of trigger factor monomer in solution.

Authors:  Kushagra Singhal; Jocelyne Vreede; Alireza Mashaghi; Sander J Tans; Peter G Bolhuis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Protein folding on the ribosome studied using NMR spectroscopy.

Authors:  Christopher A Waudby; Hélène Launay; Lisa D Cabrita; John Christodoulou
Journal:  Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc       Date:  2013-07-27       Impact factor: 9.795

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.