Literature DB >> 18042079

The impact of site and extent of clinically evident cardiovascular disease and atherosclerotic burden on new cardiovascular events in patients with Type 2 diabetes. The SMART study.

P M Gorter1, F L J Visseren, A Algra, Y van der Graaf.   

Abstract

AIMS: Patients with Type 2 diabetes and coronary heart disease (CHD) have an excess cardiovascular risk. The relationship of both other sites [cerebrovascular disease, peripheral arterial disease (PAD)] and the extent of clinically evident cardiovascular disease (CVD) with the occurrence of new cardiovascular events have not been investigated previously in patients with diabetes. We aimed to quantify this relationship and to assess the additional influence of atherosclerotic burden.
METHODS: From 1996 to 2005, 776 patients with Type 2 diabetes with (n = 458) and without (n = 318) clinically evident CVD were followed prospectively for cardiovascular events (cardiovascular death, non-fatal ischaemic stroke or myocardial infarction). CVD was classified according to the site (cerebrovascular disease, CHD, PAD); the extent of atherosclerosis was expressed as the number of affected sites. Carotid intima-media thickness and albuminuria were used as markers of atherosclerotic burden.
RESULTS: Compared with patients with diabetes without CVD, the hazard ratio (HR) for a cardiovascular event was 3.8 (95% confidence interval 1.7, 8.5), adjusted for age, gender and potential confounders, in those with cerebrovascular disease, 4.3 (1.9, 9.5) in those with CHD, and 4.6 (2.1, 10.2) in those with PAD. Findings were similar after additional adjustment for atherosclerotic burden. Adjusted HR was 3.4 (1.6, 6.9) for patients with diabetes with one affected site and 6.6 (3.0, 14.3) for those with two or more sites.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with Type 2 diabetes and cerebrovascular disease, CHD or PAD have strongly increased risks for future cardiovascular events which are comparable. This risk increases markedly with the number of different cardiovascular sites affected and is irrespective of atherosclerotic burden.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18042079     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2007.02323.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabet Med        ISSN: 0742-3071            Impact factor:   4.359


  8 in total

1.  Efficient flow suppressed MRI improves interscan reproducibility of carotid atherosclerosis plaque burden measurements.

Authors:  Li Dong; Jinnan Wang; Vasily L Yarnykh; Hunter R Underhill; Moni B Neradilek; Nayak Polissar; Thomas S Hatsukami; Chun Yuan
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2010-08       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 2.  Subclinical cardiovascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus: To screen or not to screen.

Authors:  Juan J Chillarón; Juana A Flores-Le Roux; David Benaiges; Juan Pedro-Botet
Journal:  World J Clin Cases       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 1.337

Review 3.  MR plaque imaging of the carotid artery.

Authors:  Yuji Watanabe; Masako Nagayama
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2010-02-13       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Factors associated with self-reported diabetes according to the 2013 National Health Survey.

Authors:  Deborah Carvalho Malta; Regina Tomie Ivata Bernal; Betine Pinto Moehlecke Iser; Célia Landmann Szwarcwald; Bruce Bartholow Duncan; Maria Inês Schmidt
Journal:  Rev Saude Publica       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 2.106

5.  Evaluating the Diabetes-Cardiology interface: a glimpse into the diabetes management of cardiology inpatients in western Sydney's 'diabetes hotspot' and the establishment of a novel model of care.

Authors:  Ramy H Bishay; Gideon Meyerowitz-Katz; David Chandrakumar; Rajini Jayaballa; Tien-Ming Hng; Mark Mclean; Dilini Punchihewa; Maiyoori Jeyaprakash; David Burgess; John Riskallah; Glen F Maberly
Journal:  Diabetol Metab Syndr       Date:  2018-12-14       Impact factor: 3.320

6.  Cardiovascular magnetic resonance parameters of atherosclerotic plaque burden improve discrimination of prior major adverse cardiovascular events.

Authors:  Venkatesh Mani; Paul Muntner; Samuel S Gidding; Silvia H Aguiar; Hamza El Aidi; Karen B Weinshelbaum; Hiroaki Taniguchi; Rob van der Geest; Johan H C Reiber; Sameer Bansilal; Michael Farkouh; Valentin Fuster; John E Postley; Mark Woodward; Zahi A Fayad
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2009-04-24       Impact factor: 5.364

Review 7.  Prophylactic lidocaine for myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Arturo J Martí-Carvajal; Daniel Simancas-Racines; Vidhu Anand; Shrikant Bangdiwala
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-08-21

8.  Intensification of oxidative stress and inflammation in type 2 diabetes despite antihyperglycemic treatment.

Authors:  Raymond Farah; Revital Shurtz-Swirski; Olga Lapin
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diabetol       Date:  2008-06-22       Impact factor: 9.951

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.