PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate primary care physicians' recommendation of fluoride supplements based upon a child's caries risk. METHODS: A representative sample of family physicians (FPs) and pediatricians (PDs) in the United States was mailed a letter and a questionnaire that described case scenarios of 2-year-old children-one with low and the other with high caries-risk -as well as questions about opinions on fluoride supplement use. The physicians' opinions were compared with CDC experts' consensus on the same scenarios. RESULTS: The response rates were 43% for FPs and 52% for PDs. FPs and PDs had a high agreement level (76% ond 80%, respectively) with CDC experts regarding the need for fluoride supplementation of the high-risk child. For o low risk child, all physicians showed a significantly lower level of agreement with the CDC experts (15% for FPs; 7% for PDs). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of primary care physicians follow the current fluoride supplementation guideline without considering the caries risk status of a child. If caries risk status is to be used to tailor preventive regimens, then physicians need to be educated on how to identify children with the highest need for prevention.
PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate primary care physicians' recommendation of fluoride supplements based upon a child's caries risk. METHODS: A representative sample of family physicians (FPs) and pediatricians (PDs) in the United States was mailed a letter and a questionnaire that described case scenarios of 2-year-old children-one with low and the other with high caries-risk -as well as questions about opinions on fluoride supplement use. The physicians' opinions were compared with CDC experts' consensus on the same scenarios. RESULTS: The response rates were 43% for FPs and 52% for PDs. FPs and PDs had a high agreement level (76% ond 80%, respectively) with CDC experts regarding the need for fluoride supplementation of the high-risk child. For o low risk child, all physicians showed a significantly lower level of agreement with the CDC experts (15% for FPs; 7% for PDs). CONCLUSIONS: The majority of primary care physicians follow the current fluoride supplementation guideline without considering the caries risk status of a child. If caries risk status is to be used to tailor preventive regimens, then physicians need to be educated on how to identify children with the highest need for prevention.