Literature DB >> 18040996

Treatment 'mismatch' in early prostate cancer: do treatment choices take patient quality of life into account?

Ronald C Chen1, Jack A Clark, Judith Manola, James A Talcott.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pretreatment urinary, bowel, and sexual dysfunction may increase the toxicity of prostate cancer treatments or preclude potential benefits. Using patient-reported baseline dysfunction from a prospective cohort study, we determined the proportion of patients receiving relatively contraindicated ('mismatched') treatments.
METHODS: Baseline obstructive uropathy and bowel dysfunction relatively contraindicate brachytherapy (BT) and external beam radiation therapy (EBRT), respectively, because they increase patients' vulnerability to treatment-related toxicity. Baseline sexual dysfunction renders moot the intended benefit of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy (NSRP), which is to preserve sexual function. We categorized patients' clinical circumstances by increasing complexity and counted the mismatches in each, expecting weaker or multiple contraindications to increase mismatched treatments.
RESULTS: Of 438 eligible patients, 389 (89%) reported preexisting dysfunction, and more than one-third received mismatched treatments. Mismatches did not significantly increase with clinical complexity, and watchful waiting was very infrequent, even when all treatment options were contraindicated. Patient age and comorbidity, but not preexisting dysfunction, were associated with treatment choice. As expected, mismatched BT and EBRT led to worsened urinary and bowel symptoms, respectively, and NSRP did not improve outcomes after baseline sexual dysfunction.
CONCLUSIONS: Pretreatment dysfunction does not appear to reliably influence treatment choices, and patients receiving mismatched treatments had worse outcomes. Further study is needed to determine why mismatched treatments were chosen, including the role of incomplete patient-physician communication of baseline dysfunction, and whether using a validated questionnaire before treatment decision-making would bypass this difficulty. Treatment mismatch may be a useful outcome indicator of the quality of patient-centered decisions. 2007 American Cancer Society

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18040996     DOI: 10.1002/cncr.23138

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  9 in total

1.  The Health Effects of Masculine Self-Esteem Following Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer Among Gay Men.

Authors:  Donald Allensworth-Davies; James A Talcott; Timothy Heeren; Brian de Vries; Thomas O Blank; Jack A Clark
Journal:  LGBT Health       Date:  2015-12-24       Impact factor: 4.151

2.  Racial/ethnic differences in treatment discussed, preferred, and received for prostate cancer in a tri-ethnic population.

Authors:  G M Monawar Hosain; Maureen Sanderson; Xianglin L Du; Wenyaw Chan; Sara S Strom
Journal:  Am J Mens Health       Date:  2012-03-13

3.  [The KomMent study: a pilot project on structured interprofessional communication in uro-oncology].

Authors:  Jana Jünger; Dominik Fugmann; Barbara Hinding; Ulrike Necknig; Stefan Bushuven; Stefanie Zschäbitz; Nancy Steiner; Peter Albers; Markus Giessing
Journal:  Urologie       Date:  2022-10-07

Review 4.  Prostate cancer: psychosocial implications and management.

Authors:  Andrew J Roth; Mark I Weinberger; Christian J Nelson
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 3.404

5.  Quality of life of men treated for localized prostate cancer: outcomes at 6 and 12 months.

Authors:  Elise L Lev; Lucille Sanzero Eller; Glen Gejerman; John Kolassa; Joan Colella; Janine Pezzino; Patricia Lane; Ravi Munver; Michael Esposito; John Sheuch; Vincent Lanteri; Ihor Sawczuk
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2008-08-22       Impact factor: 3.603

6.  Personal preferences and discordant prostate cancer treatment choice in an intervention trial of men newly diagnosed with localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jaclyn L F Bosco; Barbara Halpenny; Donna L Berry
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 3.186

Review 7.  Current status of penile rehabilitation after radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  Jae Heon Kim; Seung Wook Lee
Journal:  Korean J Urol       Date:  2015-01-30

8.  Taking the history in patients with swallowing disorders: an international multidisciplinary survey.

Authors:  Martina Scharitzer; Peter Pokieser; Michaela Wagner-Menghin; Ferdinand Otto; Olle Ekberg
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2017-03

Review 9.  Proton therapy for early stage prostate cancer: is there a case?

Authors:  Tabitha Y Chan; Poh Wee Tan; Johann I Tang
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 4.147

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.