RATIONALE: (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) is often taken recreationally with ethanol (EtOH). In rats, EtOH may potentiate MDMA-induced hyperactivity, but attenuate hyperthermia. OBJECTIVE: Experiment 1 compared the interactions between EtOH (1.5 g/kg) and MDMA (6.6 mg/kg) with EtOH + cocaine (COCA; 10 mg/kg) and EtOH + amphetamine (AMPH; 1 mg/kg) on locomotor activity and thermoregulation. Experiment 2 used a weaker dose of MDMA (3.3 mg/kg) and larger doses of COCA (20 mg/kg) and AMPH (2 mg/kg). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drug treatments were administered on four occasions (2, 5, and 2 days apart, respectively; experiment 1) or two (2 days apart; experiment 2). RESULTS: All psychostimulants increased activity, and EtOH markedly increased the effect of MDMA. AMPH alone-related hyperactivity showed modest sensitization across treatment days, while MDMA + EtOH activity showed marked sensitization. AMPH, COCA, and MDMA induced hyperthermia of comparable amplitude (+1 to +1.5 degrees C). Co-treatment with EtOH and AMPH (1 mg/kg) or COCA (10 mg/kg) produced hypothermia greater than that produced by EtOH alone. Conversely, EtOH attenuated MDMA-related hyperthermia, an effect increasing across treatment days. These results demonstrate that the interaction between MDMA and EtOH may be different from the interaction between EtOH and AMPH or COCA. CONCLUSION: Because of potential health-related consequences of such polydrug misuse, it is worth identifying the mechanisms underlying these interactions, especially between EtOH and MDMA. Given the different affinity profiles of the three drugs for serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine transporters, our results appear compatible with the possibility of an important role of serotonin in at least the EtOH-induced potentiation of MDMA-induced hyperlocomotion.
RATIONALE: (+/-)-3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine (MDMA, ecstasy) is often taken recreationally with ethanol (EtOH). In rats, EtOH may potentiate MDMA-induced hyperactivity, but attenuate hyperthermia. OBJECTIVE: Experiment 1 compared the interactions between EtOH (1.5 g/kg) and MDMA (6.6 mg/kg) with EtOH + cocaine (COCA; 10 mg/kg) and EtOH + amphetamine (AMPH; 1 mg/kg) on locomotor activity and thermoregulation. Experiment 2 used a weaker dose of MDMA (3.3 mg/kg) and larger doses of COCA (20 mg/kg) and AMPH (2 mg/kg). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Drug treatments were administered on four occasions (2, 5, and 2 days apart, respectively; experiment 1) or two (2 days apart; experiment 2). RESULTS: All psychostimulants increased activity, and EtOH markedly increased the effect of MDMA. AMPH alone-related hyperactivity showed modest sensitization across treatment days, while MDMA + EtOH activity showed marked sensitization. AMPH, COCA, and MDMA induced hyperthermia of comparable amplitude (+1 to +1.5 degrees C). Co-treatment with EtOH and AMPH (1 mg/kg) or COCA (10 mg/kg) produced hypothermia greater than that produced by EtOH alone. Conversely, EtOH attenuated MDMA-related hyperthermia, an effect increasing across treatment days. These results demonstrate that the interaction between MDMA and EtOH may be different from the interaction between EtOH and AMPH or COCA. CONCLUSION: Because of potential health-related consequences of such polydrug misuse, it is worth identifying the mechanisms underlying these interactions, especially between EtOH and MDMA. Given the different affinity profiles of the three drugs for serotonin, dopamine, and norepinephrine transporters, our results appear compatible with the possibility of an important role of serotonin in at least the EtOH-induced potentiation of MDMA-induced hyperlocomotion.
Authors: John F Neumaier; Evelyn S Vincow; Andreas Arvanitogiannis; Roy A Wise; William A Carlezon Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2002-12-15 Impact factor: 6.167
Authors: Sotiria Bexis; Benjamin D Phillis; Jennifer Ong; Jason M White; Rodney J Irvine Journal: Drug Alcohol Depend Date: 2004-04-09 Impact factor: 4.492
Authors: Sami Ben Hamida; Erin Plute; Sonia Bach; Christine Lazarus; Antoine Tracqui; Christian Kelche; Anne Pereira de Vasconcelos; Byron C Jones; Jean-Christophe Cassel Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2007-03-08 Impact factor: 4.415
Authors: Marta Rodríguez-Arias; Concepción Maldonado; Antonio Vidal-Infer; Consuelo Guerri; María A Aguilar; José Miñarro Journal: Psychopharmacology (Berl) Date: 2011-05-10 Impact factor: 4.530
Authors: Derek G Moore; John D Turner; Andrew C Parrott; Julia E Goodwin; Sarah E Fulton; Meeyoung O Min; Helen C Fox; Fleur M B Braddick; Emma L Axelsson; Stephanie Lynch; Helena Ribeiro; Caroline J Frostick; Lynn T Singer Journal: J Psychopharmacol Date: 2009-11-25 Impact factor: 4.153