Literature DB >> 18040615

Postoperative radiotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme: analysis and critical assessment of different treatment strategies and predictive factors.

Marc D Piroth1, Bernd Gagel, Michael Pinkawa, Sven Stanzel, Branka Asadpour, Michael J Eble.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
PURPOSE: Different factors influence glioblastoma patients' prognosis. The aim of this retrospective, explorative analysis was to define the role of recent treatment strategies and to examine the value of different prognostic factors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 110 patients was analyzed. Complete resection, partial resection, and biopsy was accomplished in 69, 22, and 19 patients, respectively. 56 patients received conventionally fractionated radiotherapy with a median total dose of 60 Gy, 2 Gy daily. 54 patients received hyperfractionated accelerated radiotherapy with a median total dose of 54 Gy, 2 x 1.8 Gy daily. 20 patients had concomitant temozolomide (50-75 mg/m2/d), and 20 patients concomitant topotecan (0.5 mg/m2 as continuous venous infusion over 21 days). 37 patients received temozolomide as salvage therapy.
RESULTS: Median overall (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) were 8.7 and 4.8 months. After complete resection, partial resection, and biopsy, OS was 9.5, 8.5, and 5.5 months, respectively. OS was 8.5, 13.8, and 8.2 months for radiotherapy alone, concomitant temozolomide, and concomitant topotecan, respectively. Hazard ratio was 0.29 (OS; p = 0.002) and 0.32 (DFS; p = 0.003) for concomitant temozolomide compared to radiotherapy alone. Topotecan led to an increased toxicity. With 9.7 months for conventionally fractionated radiotherapy and 8.1 months for hyperfractionated radiotherapy, OS differed significantly (p = 0.003, log-rank test). OS in patients with RPA (recursive partitioning analysis) score III, IV, V, and VI was 14.1, 10, 9.5, and 5.8 months (p = 0.003, log-rank test). In the univariate (p = 0.0001, log-rank test) and multivariate analysis (p = 0.002, Cox regression), salvage temozolomide led to a statistically significant survival benefit (10.6 vs. 7.7 months).
CONCLUSION: Concomitant topotecan or the use of hyperfractionated radiotherapy did not show to be superior in outcome in this retrospective analysis. Topotecan led to an increased toxicity. An attempt at complete resection is justified. Temozolomide should be integrated in therapy initially. As salvage therapy, temozolomide is also effective.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18040615     DOI: 10.1007/s00066-007-1739-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol        ISSN: 0179-7158            Impact factor:   3.621


  15 in total

1.  18F-FET-PET-based dose painting by numbers with protons.

Authors:  Mark Rickhey; Zdenek Morávek; Christoph Eilles; Oliver Koelbl; Ludwig Bogner
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-05-21       Impact factor: 3.621

2.  [Prediction of clinical course of glioblastomas by MRI during radiotherapy].

Authors:  Christina Leitzen; Hans H Schild; Birgitta Bungart; Ulrich Herrlinger; Christiana Lütter; Thomas Müdder; Timo Wilhelm-Buchstab; Heinrich Schüller
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 3.621

Review 3.  Airway hydration and COPD.

Authors:  Arunava Ghosh; R C Boucher; Robert Tarran
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-06-12       Impact factor: 9.261

4.  Radiochemotherapy with temozolomide for patients with glioblastoma. Prognostic factors and long-term outcome of unselected patients from a single institution.

Authors:  Johanna Gerstein; Kea Franz; Joachim P Steinbach; Volkert Seifert; Claus Rödel; Christian Weiss
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-10-28       Impact factor: 3.621

5.  Prognostic impact of hemoglobin level and other factors in patients with high-grade gliomas treated with postoperative radiochemotherapy and sequential chemotherapy based on temozolomide: a 10-year experience at a single institution.

Authors:  Giampiero Ausili Céfaro; Domenico Genovesi; Annamaria Vinciguerra; Marianna Trignani; Maria Taraborrelli; Antonietta Augurio; Roberto Buonaguidi; Renato J Galzio; Marta Di Nicola
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 3.621

6.  The importance of tumor volume in the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma: comparison of computerized volumetry and geometric models.

Authors:  Georgios Iliadis; Panagiotis Selviaridis; Anna Kalogera-Fountzila; Anna Fragkoulidi; Dimos Baltas; Nikolaos Tselis; Athanasios Chatzisotiriou; Despina Misailidou; Nikolaos Zamboglou; George Fountzilas
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-11-10       Impact factor: 3.621

7.  Comparison of stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) alone and whole brain radiotherapy (WBRT) plus a stereotactic boost (WBRT+SRS) for one to three brain metastases.

Authors:  Dirk Rades; Jan-Dirk Kueter; Dagmar Hornung; Theo Veninga; Patrick Hanssens; Steven E Schild; Juergen Dunst
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2008-12-24       Impact factor: 3.621

8.  Radiation therapy for prevention of heterotopic ossification about the elbow.

Authors:  Reinhard Heyd; Thomas Buhleier; Nikolaos Zamboglou
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-08-04       Impact factor: 3.621

9.  MRI during radiotherapy of glioblastoma : Does MRI allow for prognostic stratification?

Authors:  C Leitzen; T Wilhelm-Buchstab; L C Schmeel; S Garbe; S Greschus; T Müdder; S Oberste-Beulmann; B Simon; H H Schild; H Schüller
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 3.621

10.  Hypofractionated reirradiation for recurrent malignant glioma.

Authors:  Guido Henke; Frank Paulsen; Joachim P Steinbach; Ute Ganswindt; Hana Isijanov; Rolf-Dieter Kortmann; Michael Bamberg; Claus Belka
Journal:  Strahlenther Onkol       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 3.621

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.