Literature DB >> 18040171

Surgical cephalometrics: applications and developments.

Craig A Hurst1, Barry L Eppley, Robert J Havlik, A Michael Sadove.   

Abstract

LEARNING
OBJECTIVES: After studying this article, the participant should be able to: 1. Describe the historical origins of modern cephalometry. 2. Identify common landmark points on the lateral cephalogram. 3. Describe multiple common clinical uses for cephalometry. 4. Exhibit knowledge of developments in imaging and analysis alternatives.
BACKGROUND: Interest in the dimensions of the human head has been present since antiquity. Proportional analysis and measures from cadaveric specimens led to the development of radiologic image capture and analysis on living subjects. These techniques were originally applied to establishing normative values, documenting growth, and diagnosing dentofacial disharmonies. This article reviews the origins of cephalometric methodology and current developments and applications.
METHODS: The authors conducted a MEDLINE search and review of all English language articles using the keywords "cephalometric" and "cephalometrics."
RESULTS: Cephalometrics have undergone substantial use and development since the introduction of radiologic imaging on living human subjects in 1931. Although frequently associated with orthognathic surgery, cephalometrics have been applied to a number of conditions involving altered craniofacial morphology. Advances in imaging and computing have led to increased interest in three-dimensional and non-x-ray-based assessment of the human head. Mathematical models have been applied to standard cephalometric information to increase the descriptive accuracy of the complex shapes involved.
CONCLUSIONS: Cephalometric techniques and analyses are versatile tools that can be applied to a wide variety of clinical scenarios involving the craniofacial region. New technologies and expanded applications promise to continue the development and use of this well-established methodology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18040171     DOI: 10.1097/01.prs.0000282728.97278.a2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Plast Reconstr Surg        ISSN: 0032-1052            Impact factor:   4.730


  5 in total

1.  Computer-aided cephalometric landmark annotation for CBCT data.

Authors:  Marina Codari; Matteo Caffini; Gianluca M Tartaglia; Chiarella Sforza; Giuseppe Baselli
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2016-06-29       Impact factor: 2.924

2.  Precision of cephalometric landmark identification: cone-beam computed tomography vs conventional cephalometric views.

Authors:  John B Ludlow; Maritzabel Gubler; Lucia Cevidanes; André Mol
Journal:  Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 2.650

3.  Three-dimensional canine displacement patterns in response to translation and controlled tipping retraction strategies.

Authors:  Shuning Li; Zeyang Xia; Sean Shih-Yao Liu; George Eckert; Jie Chen
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 2.079

4.  Computer-Assisted Orthognathic Surgery for Patients with Cleft Lip/Palate: From Traditional Planning to Three-Dimensional Surgical Simulation.

Authors:  Daniel Lonic; Betty Chien-Jung Pai; Kazuaki Yamaguchi; Peerasak Chortrakarnkij; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-22       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Outcome of facial contour asymmetry after conventional two-dimensional versus computer-assisted three-dimensional planning in cleft orthognathic surgery.

Authors:  Po-Jung Hsu; Rafael Denadai; Betty C J Pai; Hsiu-Hsia Lin; Lun-Jou Lo
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.