Literature DB >> 18039600

Augmentation mammoplasty: effect on diagnosis of breast cancer.

S A McIntosh1, K Horgan.   

Abstract

Breast augmentation for cosmetic purposes is an increasingly common procedure in the USA and UK. In the USA in 2003, a total of 254 140 breast augmentation procedures were carried out [American Society of Plastic Surgeons, http://www.plasticsurgery.org/news_room/Procedural-Statistics-Press-Kit-Index.cfm9-1-2005; 2006.(1)]. It has been previously estimated that between 1 and 1.5 million women in the USA have prosthetic breast implants [Cook RR, Delongchamp RR, Woodbury M, et al. The prevalence of women with breast implants in the United States, 1989. J Clin Epidemiol 1995;48:519-25.(2)]. The UK National Breast Implant Registry has recorded a rise in the numbers of women receiving breast implants, with over 13 000 procedures registered in 2001; an estimated 77% of these were for cosmetic purposes. No association has been found between the presence of breast implants in a breast and an increased risk of breast cancer, and this subject has been comprehensively reviewed elsewhere [Hoshaw SJ, Klein PJ, Clark BD, et al. Breast implants and cancer: causation, delayed detection, and survival. Plast Reconstr Surg 2001;107:1393-407.(3)]. However, as the population of women with breast implants ages, an increasing number of them will develop breast cancer; a reflection of the fact that the incidence of the disease increases with increasing age. Debate continues on the effect of breast implants on the efficacy of mammography in diagnosing breast cancer, and the role of other imaging techniques for this purpose, as well as the limitations that the presence of implants place on percutaneous biopsy techniques. We review the literature on the radiological and tissue diagnosis of breast cancer in women with a history of previous augmentation mammaplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18039600     DOI: 10.1016/j.bjps.2007.06.035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg        ISSN: 1748-6815            Impact factor:   2.740


  7 in total

1.  Treatment for displacement of PAAG mixture after injection augmentation mammoplasty.

Authors:  Liang Chen; Liu Sha; Shu-Peng Huang; Shi-Rong Li; Zhen-Xiang Wang
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-03-15

2.  Screening of women with aesthetic prostheses in dedicated sessions of a population-based breast cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Silvia Deandrea; Laura Cavazzana; Niccolò Principi; Ester Luconi; Mauro Campoleoni; Anan Judina Bastiampillai; Lucia Bracchi; Lauro Bucchi; Stella Pedilarco; Antonio Piscitelli; Maria Silvia Sfondrini; Anna Rita Silvestri; Silvana Castaldi
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2021-05-05       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Polyacrylamide hydrogel injection for breast augmentation: another injectable failure.

Authors:  Zhenxiang Wang; Shirong Li; Lingli Wang; Shu Zhang; Yan Jiang; Jinping Chen; Donglin Luo
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2012-06

4.  Imaging in patients with breast implants-results of the First International Breast (Implant) Conference 2009.

Authors:  Frank Stöblen; Mahdi Rezai; Sherko Kümmel
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2010-05-04

5.  Current practice in mammographic imaging of the augmented breast in Australia.

Authors:  Jacquelyn R O'Keefe; Jenny Maree Wilkinson; Kelly Maree Spuur
Journal:  J Med Radiat Sci       Date:  2020-01-24

Review 6.  Gynaecological aspects of the treatment and follow-up of transsexual men and women.

Authors:  S Weyers; P De Sutter; S Hoebeke; G Monstrey; G 'T Sjoen; H Verstraelen; J Gerris
Journal:  Facts Views Vis Obgyn       Date:  2010

7.  Study of breast implants mammography examinations for identification of suitable image quality criteria.

Authors:  Cláudia Sá Dos Reis; Isabelle Gremion; Nicole Richli Meystre
Journal:  Insights Imaging       Date:  2020-01-03
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.