Literature DB >> 18039410

Mentorship, learning curves, and balance.

Meryl S Cohen1, Jeffrey P Jacobs, James A Quintessenza, Paul J Chai, Harald L Lindberg, Jamie Dickey, Ross M Ungerleider.   

Abstract

Professionals working in the arena of health care face a variety of challenges as their careers evolve and develop. In this review, we analyze the role of mentorship, learning curves, and balance in overcoming challenges that all such professionals are likely to encounter. These challenges can exist both in professional and personal life. As any professional involved in health care matures, complex professional skills must be mastered, and new professional skills must be acquired. These skills are both technical and judgmental. In most circumstances, these skills must be learned. In 2007, despite the continued need for obtaining new knowledge and learning new skills, the professional and public tolerance for a "learning curve" is much less than in previous decades. Mentorship is the key to success in these endeavours. The success of mentorship is two-sided, with responsibilities for both the mentor and the mentee. The benefits of this relationship must be bidirectional. It is the responsibility of both the student and the mentor to assure this bidirectional exchange of benefit. This relationship requires time, patience, dedication, and to some degree selflessness. This mentorship will ultimately be the best tool for mastering complex professional skills and maturing through various learning curves. Professional mentorship also requires that mentors identify and explicitly teach their mentees the relational skills and abilities inherent in learning the management of the triad of self, relationships with others, and professional responsibilities.Up to two decades ago, a learning curve was tolerated, and even expected, while professionals involved in healthcare developed the techniques that allowed for the treatment of previously untreatable diseases. Outcomes have now improved to the point that this type of learning curve is no longer acceptable to the public. Still, professionals must learn to perform and develop independence and confidence. The responsibility to meet this challenge without a painful learning curve belongs to both the younger professionals, who must progress through the learning curve, and the more mature professionals who must create an appropriate environment for learning. In addition to mentorship, the detailed tracking of outcomes is an essential tool for mastering any learning curve. It is crucial to utilize a detailed database to track outcomes, to learn, and to protect both yourself and your patients. It is our professional responsibility to engage in self-evaluation, in part employing voluntary sharing of data. For cardiac surgical subspecialties, the databases now existing for The European Association for CardioThoracic Surgery and The Society of Thoracic Surgeons represent the ideal tool for monitoring outcomes. Evolving initiatives in the fields of paediatric cardiology, paediatric critical care, and paediatric cardiac anaesthesia will play similar roles.A variety of professional and personal challenges must be met by all those working in health care. The acquisition of learned skills, and the use of special tools, will facilitate the process of conquering these challenges. Choosing appropriate role models and mentors can help progression through any learning curve in a controlled and protected fashion. Professional and personal satisfaction are both necessities. Finding the satisfactory balance between work and home life is difficult, but possible with the right tools, organization skills, and support system at work and at home. The concepts of mentorship, learning curves and balance cannot be underappreciated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18039410     DOI: 10.1017/S1047951107001266

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cardiol Young        ISSN: 1047-9511            Impact factor:   1.093


  13 in total

1.  Teaching laparoscopy to residents: how can we select good candidates?

Authors:  Miguel Ramirez-Backhaus; Giles Hellawell; Mafalda Melo; Ana Covita; Jens-Uwe Stolzenburg
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Training the novice to become cardiac surgeon: does the "early learning curve" training compromise surgical outcomes?

Authors:  Ed Peng; Pradip K Sarkar
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2013-10-01

3.  Barriers to Women Entering Surgical Careers: A Global Study into Medical Student Perceptions.

Authors:  I H Marks; A Diaz; M Keem; Seyedeh-Sanam Ladi-Seyedian; G S Philipo; H Munir; T I Pomerani; H M Sughayer; N Peter; C Lavy; D C Chang
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 4.  Assessment of specialists in cardiovascular practice.

Authors:  Kamran Ahmed; Hutan Ashrafian; George B Hanna; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 32.419

5.  A framework to establish a mentoring programme in surgery.

Authors:  Ali Kirresh; Vanash M Patel; Oliver J Warren; Mariam Ali; Hutan Ashrafian; Alex M Almoudaris; Ara Darzi; Thanos Athanasiou
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2011-05-28       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  Mentorship in surgical training: a systematic review.

Authors:  Pouya Entezami; Lauren E Franzblau; Kevin C Chung
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-11-29

7.  Perspectives on academic mentorship from sexual and gender minority students pursuing careers in the health sciences.

Authors:  Ian W Holloway; Ayako Miyashita Ochoa; Elizabeth S C Wu; Rebecca Himmelstein; Jeffrey O Wong; Bianca D M Wilson
Journal:  Am J Orthopsychiatry       Date:  2019

Review 8.  Clinical research careers: reports from a NHLBI pediatric heart network clinical research skills development conference.

Authors:  Wyman W Lai; Victoria L Vetter; Marc Richmond; Jennifer S Li; J Philip Saul; Seema Mital; Steven D Colan; Jane W Newburger; Lynn A Sleeper; Brian W McCrindle; L Luann Minich; Elizabeth Goldmuntz; Bradley S Marino; Ismee A Williams; Gail D Pearson; Frank Evans; Jane D Scott; Meryl S Cohen
Journal:  Am Heart J       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.749

9.  Athletic trainer perceptions of life-work balance and parenting concerns.

Authors:  Lindsey E Eberman; Leamor Kahanov
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2013-02-20       Impact factor: 2.860

10.  Results after primary reverse shoulder arthroplasty with and without subscapularis repair: a prospective-randomized trial.

Authors:  Nina Myline Engel; Malte Holschen; Domink Schorn; Kai-Axel Witt; Jörn Steinbeck
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2021-07-08       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.