Literature DB >> 18038276

Novel sound production through contingency learning in the Pacific walrus (Odobenus rosmarus divergens).

Ronald J Schusterman1, Colleen Reichmuth.   

Abstract

Walruses (Odobenus rosmarus) are highly vocal amphibious mammals with a range of anatomical specializations that can provide plasticity to their sound emissions. The objective of this descriptive study was to determine whether contingency learning could be used to increase variability and induce novelty in the acoustic behavior of walruses. The subjects were two twelve-year-old captive walruses, a male and a female that had previously been conditioned using food reinforcement to produce several specific sounds in response to different discriminative cues. In the current task, these individuals were encouraged to produce novel sounds and novel sound combinations in air by withholding reinforcement for sounds previously emitted in a given session and providing reinforcement only for qualitative differences in emitted sounds. Following training in air, the walruses were tested under water with the same reinforcement contingency. The subjects responded as they had done in air, by varying their underwater sound emissions until reinforcement was provided. Many of the sounds and sound combinations produced by the subjects during underwater testing were quite different from those produced during training in air and those produced under water during baseline observations. Both the male and female spontaneously emitted knocks and soft bells which are components of the songs known to be emitted by mature male walruses during the breeding season. The finding that reinforced variability can induce creativity in sound production is consistent with recent experiments on budgerigar birds showing that vocal topographies, like motor responses, may be influenced by contingency learning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18038276     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-007-0120-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  11 in total

Review 1.  The re-tooled mind: how culture re-engineers cognition.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-01-12       Impact factor: 3.436

Review 2.  Rhythmic entrainment: Why humans want to, fireflies can't help it, pet birds try, and sea lions have to be bribed.

Authors:  Margaret Wilson; Peter F Cook
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2016-12

Review 3.  Second verse, same as the first: learning generalizable relational concepts through functional repetition.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Allison Scagel
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-12       Impact factor: 2.899

4.  Cognitive control of song production by humpback whales.

Authors:  Eduardo Mercado; Mariam Ashour; Samantha McAllister
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-09-04       Impact factor: 2.899

Review 5.  Mouse vocal communication system: are ultrasounds learned or innate?

Authors:  Gustavo Arriaga; Erich D Jarvis
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2013-01-04       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 6.  Vocal learning in elephants: neural bases and adaptive context.

Authors:  Angela S Stoeger; Paul Manger
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 6.627

7.  How small could a pup sound? The physical bases of signaling body size in harbor seals.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; Stephanie Gross; Maxime Garcia; Ana Rubio-Garcia; Bart de Boer
Journal:  Curr Zool       Date:  2017-04-12       Impact factor: 2.624

8.  The evolutionary biology of musical rhythm: was Darwin wrong?

Authors:  Aniruddh D Patel
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 8.029

9.  What Pinnipeds Have to Say about Human Speech, Music, and the Evolution of Rhythm.

Authors:  Andrea Ravignani; W Tecumseh Fitch; Frederike D Hanke; Tamara Heinrich; Bettina Hurgitsch; Sonja A Kotz; Constance Scharff; Angela S Stoeger; Bart de Boer
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-20       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Rhythmic cognition in humans and animals: distinguishing meter and pulse perception.

Authors:  W Tecumseh Fitch
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-31
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.