Literature DB >> 18037352

Neurologic impairment from ectopic bone in the lumbar canal: a potential complication of off-label PLIF/TLIF use of bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2).

David A Wong1, Anant Kumar, Sanjay Jatana, Gary Ghiselli, Katherine Wong.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND CONTEXT: Bone morphogenetic protein-2 (BMP-2) (Infuse) has been approved for use in anterior lumbar fusion in conjunction with an LT cage. However, off-label use is seen with anterior cervical fusion, posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). The Federal Food and Drug Administration trial of BMP-2 in a PLIF application was halted because of a high incidence of ectopic bone forming in the neural canal (75%). The authors did not find a correlation between ectopic bone and increased leg pain. They concluded that the ectopic bone was a radiographic phenomenon and not associated with clinical findings. Complications using BMP in the cervical spine have been reported. Heretofore, there has not been a similar warning voiced for use of BMP in a lumbar PLIF or TLIF.
PURPOSE: The purpose was to report five cases of ectopic bone in the canal associated with PLIF/TLIF off-label use of BMP-2 potentially contributing to abnormal neurologic findings. STUDY DESIGN/
SETTING: This is an observational cohort study of patients referred to a tertiary care private medical center.
METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of patients referred to a tertiary spine institute with complications after surgery where BMP-2 had been used in an off-label PLIF or TLIF application. Patient demographics, operating room (OR) notes from the index BMP surgery, imaging studies, and current clinical status were reviewed.
RESULTS: Five cases of ectopic bone in the spinal canal with potential neurologic compromise were identified.
CONCLUSIONS: It does appear that ectopic bone in the spinal canal associated with BMP-2 use in PLIF or TLIF may contribute to symptomatic neurologic findings in rare cases. Revision surgeries are difficult. This article challenges a previous publication, which concluded that the high incidence of ectopic bone was of no clinical significance. Isolating BMP anteriorly in the disc space using layered barriers of bone graft between the BMP and the annular defect may reduce the incidence of ectopic bone in the spinal canal. Surgeons need to weigh the benefits versus risks of any technology used off label when making treatment decisions with their patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18037352     DOI: 10.1016/j.spinee.2007.06.014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine J        ISSN: 1529-9430            Impact factor:   4.166


  93 in total

1.  RhBMP-2 use in lumbar fusion surgery is associated with transient immediate post-operative leg pain.

Authors:  Fiachra E Rowan; Natasha O'Malley; Ashley Poynton
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2011-12-14       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Could the use of bone morphogenetic proteins in fracture healing do more harm than good to our patients?

Authors:  Domagoj Delimar; Tomislav Smoljanovic; Ivan Bojanic
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Recommendation for use of rhBMP-2 in spinal interbody fusions.

Authors:  Tomislav Smoljanovic; Ana Aljinovic; Ivan Bojanic
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-04-30       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Adverse effects of posterior lumbar interbody fusion using rhBMP-2.

Authors:  Tomislav Smoljanovic; Ivan Bojanic; Domagoj Delimar
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Successful spinal fusion by E. coli-derived BMP-2-adsorbed porous beta-TCP granules: a pilot study.

Authors:  Sho Dohzono; Yuuki Imai; Hiroaki Nakamura; Shigeyuki Wakitani; Kunio Takaoka
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-07-07       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Scaffold-mediated BMP-2 minicircle DNA delivery accelerated bone repair in a mouse critical-size calvarial defect model.

Authors:  Michael Keeney; Michael T Chung; Elizabeth R Zielins; Kevin J Paik; Adrian McArdle; Shane D Morrison; Ryan C Ransom; Namrata Barbhaiya; David Atashroo; Gunilla Jacobson; Richard N Zare; Michael T Longaker; Derrick C Wan; Fan Yang
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res A       Date:  2016-06-03       Impact factor: 4.396

Review 7.  Scaffold translation: barriers between concept and clinic.

Authors:  Scott J Hollister; William L Murphy
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part B Rev       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 6.389

8.  Complications, revision fusions, readmissions, and utilization over a 1-year period after bone morphogenetic protein use during primary cervical spine fusions.

Authors:  Adam P Goode; William J Richardson; Robin M Schectman; Timothy S Carey
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2013-12-07       Impact factor: 4.166

9.  An adhesive bone marrow scaffold and bone morphogenetic-2 protein carrier for cartilage tissue engineering.

Authors:  Jacob A Simson; Iossif A Strehin; Qiaozhi Lu; Manuel O Uy; Jennifer H Elisseeff
Journal:  Biomacromolecules       Date:  2013-02-04       Impact factor: 6.988

10.  A comparative evaluation of factors influencing osteoinductivity among scaffolds designed for bone regeneration.

Authors:  Erin L Hsu; Jason H Ghodasra; Amruta Ashtekar; Michael S Nickoli; Sungsoo S Lee; Samuel I Stupp; Wellington K Hsu
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 3.845

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.