Literature DB >> 18037316

Influence of oral contraceptive use on growth hormone in vivo bioactivity following resistance exercise: responses of molecular mass variants.

William J Kraemer1, Bradley C Nindl, Jeff S Volek, James O Marx, Lincoln A Gotshalk, Jill A Bush, Jill R Welsch, Jakob L Vingren, Barry A Spiering, Maren S Fragala, Disa L Hatfield, Jen-Yu Ho, Carl M Maresh, Andrea M Mastro, Wesley C Hymer.   

Abstract

The purpose was to examine effects of oral contraceptive (OC) use on plasma growth hormone (GH) responses to heavy resistance exercise. Sixty untrained women were placed into one of two groups: currently using OC (Ortho Tri-Cyclen) (n=25; mean+/-SD: 24.5+/-4.2y, 160.4+/-7.1cm, 64.1+/-11.3kg) or not currently using OC (NOC) (n=35; 23.6+/-4.6y, 165.9+/-6.0cm, 65.7+/-10.3kg). Participants performed an acute heavy resistance exercise test (AHRET; six sets of 10 repetition squats; 2min rest between sets) during days 2-4 of the follicular phase (NOC group) or of inactive oral contraceptive intake (OC group). Plasma was obtained before and immediately after AHRET and subsequently fractionated based on apparent molecular weight (>60kD, 30-60kD, and <30kD). GH was determined in unfractionated plasma and each plasma fraction using 4 methods: (1) Nichols Institute Diagnostics immunoradiometric assay (Nichols), (2) National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive Kidney Diseases (NIDDK) competitive radioimmunoassay, (3) DSL immunofunctional enzyme-linked immunoabsorbent assay (IFA) and (4) rat tibial line bioassay. GH increased (P<0.05) in all fractions post-AHRET for the Nichols, NIDDK, and IFA. The OC group displayed higher resting GH for the NIDDK, and higher exercise-induced GH for the IFA, Nichols, and NIDDK in unfractionated plasma and >60kD subfraction compared to NOC group. No differences were observed for the tibial line bioassay. OC use augmented immunological GH response to AHRET in unfractionated plasma and >60kD molecular weight subfraction. However, OC use only increased biological activity of GH in one of two bioassays. These data demonstrated that GH concentrations at rest and following exercise are assay-dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18037316     DOI: 10.1016/j.ghir.2007.10.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Growth Horm IGF Res        ISSN: 1096-6374            Impact factor:   2.372


  5 in total

Review 1.  Resistance Training and Skeletal Muscle Protein Metabolism in Eumenorrheic Females: Implications for Researchers and Practitioners.

Authors:  Olivia E Knowles; Brad Aisbett; Luana C Main; Eric J Drinkwater; Liliana Orellana; Séverine Lamon
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  Hormone responses to an acute bout of low intensity blood flow restricted resistance exercise in college-aged females.

Authors:  Eonho Kim; Lee D Gregg; Ldaeyeol Kim; Vanessa D Sherk; Michael G Bemben; Debra A Bemben
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2014-01-20       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 3.  Obesity, growth hormone and exercise.

Authors:  Gwendolyn A Thomas; William J Kraemer; Brett A Comstock; Courtenay Dunn-Lewis; Carl M Maresh; Jeff S Volek
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 11.136

4.  The Effect of the Menstrual Cycle and Oral Contraceptives on Acute Responses and Chronic Adaptations to Resistance Training: A Systematic Review of the Literature.

Authors:  Belinda Thompson; Ashley Almarjawi; Dean Sculley; Xanne Janse de Jonge
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 5.  Growth hormone: isoforms, clinical aspects and assays interference.

Authors:  Júnia Ribeiro de Oliveira Longo Schweizer; Antônio Ribeiro-Oliveira; Martin Bidlingmaier
Journal:  Clin Diabetes Endocrinol       Date:  2018-08-28
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.