OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers to return to work after burn injury as identified by the patient. DESIGN: A cohort study with telephone interview up to 1 year. SETTING: Hospital-based burn centers at 3 national sites. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients (N=154) meeting the American Burn Association criteria for major burn injury, employed at least 20 hours a week at the time of injury, and with access to a telephone after discharge. INTERVENTION: Patients were contacted via telephone every 2 weeks up to 4 months, then monthly up to 1 year after discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A return to work survey was used to identify barriers that prevented patients from returning to work. A graphic rating scale determined the impact of each barrier. RESULTS: By 1 year, 79.7% of patients returned to work. Physical and wound issues were barriers early after discharge. Although physical abilities continued to be a significant barrier up to 1 year, working conditions (temperature, humidity, safety) and psychosocial factors (nightmares, flashbacks, appearance concerns) became important issues in those with long-term disability. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients return to work after a burn injury. Although physical and work conditions are important barriers, psychosocial issues need to be evaluated and treated to optimize return to work.
OBJECTIVE: To identify barriers to return to work after burn injury as identified by the patient. DESIGN: A cohort study with telephone interview up to 1 year. SETTING: Hospital-based burn centers at 3 national sites. PARTICIPANTS: Hospitalized patients (N=154) meeting the American Burn Association criteria for major burn injury, employed at least 20 hours a week at the time of injury, and with access to a telephone after discharge. INTERVENTION: Patients were contacted via telephone every 2 weeks up to 4 months, then monthly up to 1 year after discharge. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A return to work survey was used to identify barriers that prevented patients from returning to work. A graphic rating scale determined the impact of each barrier. RESULTS: By 1 year, 79.7% of patients returned to work. Physical and wound issues were barriers early after discharge. Although physical abilities continued to be a significant barrier up to 1 year, working conditions (temperature, humidity, safety) and psychosocial factors (nightmares, flashbacks, appearance concerns) became important issues in those with long-term disability. CONCLUSIONS: The majority of patients return to work after a burn injury. Although physical and work conditions are important barriers, psychosocial issues need to be evaluated and treated to optimize return to work.
Authors: M Elmasry; I Steinvall; J Thorfinn; P Olofsson; A H Abbas; I Abdelrahman; O A Adly; F Sjoberg Journal: Ann Burns Fire Disasters Date: 2016-09-30
Authors: Zachary J Schlader; Matthew S Ganio; James Pearson; Rebekah A I Lucas; Daniel Gagnon; Eric Rivas; Karen J Kowalske; Craig G Crandall Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2015-04-30
Authors: Lewis E Kazis; Molly Marino; Pengsheng Ni; Marina Soley Bori; Flor Amaya; Emily Dore; Colleen M Ryan; Jeff C Schneider; Vivian Shie; Amy Acton; Alan M Jette Journal: Qual Life Res Date: 2017-05-10 Impact factor: 4.147
Authors: Gabriel Hundeshagen; Vanessa N Collins; Paul Wurzer; William Sherman; Charles D Voigt; Janos Cambiaso-Daniel; Omar Nunez Lopez; Jason Sheaffer; David N Herndon; Celeste C Finnerty; Ludwik K Branski Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2018-02-20 Impact factor: 1.845
Authors: Jeremy Goverman; Katie Mathews; Radha K Holavanahalli; Andrew Vardanian; David N Herndon; Walter J Meyer; Karen Kowalske; Jim Fauerbach; Nicole S Gibran; Gretchen J Carrougher; Dagmar Amtmann; Jeffrey C Schneider; Colleen M Ryan Journal: J Burn Care Res Date: 2017 Jan/Feb Impact factor: 1.819
Authors: Jeffrey C Schneider; Nhi-Ha T Trinh; Elizabeth Selleck; Felipe Fregni; Sara S Salles; Colleen M Ryan; Joel Stein Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-15 Impact factor: 3.240