Literature DB >> 18036391

Health care costs and medication adherence associated with initiation of insulin pen therapy in Medicaid-enrolled patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective database analysis.

Manjiri D Pawaskar1, Fabian T Camacho, Roger T Anderson, David Cobden, Ashish V Joshi, Rajesh Balkrishnan.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Clinical, health, and economic outcomes in patients with type 2 diabetes may be influenced by self-management behaviors and type of pharmacotherapy.
OBJECTIVE: This study examined differences in medication adherence and total health care costs among patients with type 2 diabetes who initiated or converted to insulin administration with a pen device in comparison with a vial/syringe as add-on therapy to oral antidiabetic drugs.
METHODS: This study evaluated patients with type 2 diabetes who were enrolled in the North Carolina Medicaid program from September 24, 2001, to July 18, 2006. Patients receiving insulin with a vial/syringe who converted to pen therapy were compared with those who remained on vial/syringe in both unmatched comparisons (n = 560 and n = 9988, respectively) and after pair-matching (both cohorts, n = 560) with the use of propensity scores. In a second analysis, patients who initiated insulin with vial/syringe (n = 1162) were compared with a cohort that initiated insulin pen therapy (n = 168) after controlling for covariates in a multivariate regression model. All included patients had complete enrollment for at least 24 months of follow-up. Multiple linear regression models were used to predict the comparative impact on total health care costs and medication adherence for each cohort. Adjusted means were calculated to determine the group differences for each outcome.
RESULTS: Diabetes-related and overall medication adherence was comparable for patients initiating insulin with a pen versus a syringe (53% vs 50% and 94% vs 94%, respectively). However, total annualized health care costs were significantly lower for patients using pen therapy than for those using a syringe ($14,857.42 vs $31,764.78, respectively; P < 0.05). Cost reductions with pen therapy were reflected in hospital costs ($1195.93 vs $4965.31, respectively; P < 0.05), diabetes-related costs ($7324.37 vs $13,762.21, respectively; P < 0.05), and outpatient costs ($7795.98 vs $13,103.51, respectively; P < 0.05). However, prescription costs of syringe were significantly lower ($535.70 vs $670.52; P < 0.05) and costs of pen were higher ($840.33 vs $0; P < 0.05) in patients who were switched from syringe to pen versus those who remained on syringe therapy.
CONCLUSIONS: In a state Medicaid setting among patients with type 2 diabetes, initiating insulin therapy with a pen device was associated with comparable medication adherence and significant reductions in health care resource utilization and associated costs compared with vial/syringe insulin. Health care professionals and policy makers should consider the potential economic benefits of pen therapy when initiating insulin among Medicaid beneficiaries who fail to respond to oral antidiabetic drugs. (c) 2007 Excerpta Medica, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18036391     DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2007.07.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Ther        ISSN: 0149-2918            Impact factor:   3.393


  27 in total

1.  Analysis of "Dose Accuracy, Injection Force, and Usability Assessment of a New Half-Unit, Prefilled Insulin Pen".

Authors:  Mallika Bariya; Irina Nayberg
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2017-12-27

2.  An analysis of patient acceptance and safety of a prefilled insulin injection device.

Authors:  Lisa Kroon
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-11-01

3.  Needle with a novel attachment versus conventional screw-thread needles: a preference and ease-of-use test among children and adolescents with diabetes.

Authors:  Paul Hofman; Søren Kruse Lilleøre; Gitte Ter-Borch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-11-01

4.  Trend analyses of insulin delivery systems in the United States.

Authors:  Lauren J Lee; Qian Li; Matthew W Reynolds; William Engelman
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

5.  A Pan-European and Canadian prospective survey to evaluate patient satisfaction with the SoloSTAR insulin injection device in type 1 and type 2 diabetes.

Authors:  Nicolae Hancu; Leszek Czupryniak; Elisabeth Genestin; Harald Sourij
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

6.  A retrospective database analysis of insulin use patterns in insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes initiating basal insulin or mixtures.

Authors:  Machaon M K Bonafede; Anupama Kalsekar; Manjiri Pawaskar; Kimberly M Ruiz; Amelito M Torres; Karen R Kelly; Suellen M Curkendall
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2010-06-24       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Patch-pump technology to manage type 2 diabetes mellitus: hurdles to market acceptance.

Authors:  Matthew J Skladany; Michaela Miller; Joshua S Guthermann; Christopher R Ludwig
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-11

8.  Insulin pen-the "iPod" for insulin delivery (why pen wins over syringe).

Authors:  Ernest Asamoah
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2008-03

9.  Analysis of comparison of patient preference for two insulin injection pen devices in relation to patient dexterity skills.

Authors:  Kellie J Antinori-Lent
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2012-07-01

10.  Laboratory and Benchtop Performance of a Mealtime Insulin-Delivery System.

Authors:  Darlene M Dreon; Trevor M Hannon; Brett Cross; Brett J Carter; Nicholas S Mercer; Jason H Nguyen; Andy Tran; Peter A Melendez; Nancy Morales; Jonathan E Nelson; Meng H Tan
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-02-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.