Literature DB >> 18035619

Capturing conceptual implicit memory: the time it takes to produce an association.

Kathleen L Hourihan1, Coln M MacLeod.   

Abstract

Conceptual implicit memory is demonstrated when, in the absence of explicit retrieval, performance on a task requiring conceptual processing benefits more from prior conceptual encoding than from prior nonconceptual encoding. In the present study, we sought to provide an improved measure of conceptual implicit memory by minimizing contamination from explicit retrieval. On a modified word association test, participants free-associated to the actually studied items, with response time to produce any associate serving as the dependent measure. Experiment 1 varied whether words were read or generated at study and showed that generated words were associated to more quickly than were read words. Experiment 2 varied level of processing at study and showed that words processed semantically were associated to more quickly than were words processed nonsemantically. With modifications to ensure its implicit nature, a conceptual implicit test can be consistently affected by the same encoding manipulations as those that affect conceptual explicit memory tests.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035619     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  15 in total

1.  Measuring automatic retrieval.

Authors:  K D Horton; D E Wilson; M Evans
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Divided attention, aging, and priming in exemplar generation and category verification.

Authors:  L L Light; M W Prull; R F Kennison
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-07

3.  Effects of divided attention on perceptual and conceptual memory tests: an analysis using a process-dissociation approach.

Authors:  M Schmitter-Edgecombe
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-05

4.  Covert operations: orthographic recoding as a basis for repetition priming in word identification.

Authors:  Michael E J Masson; Colin M MacLeod
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 5.  Implicit memory. Retention without remembering.

Authors:  H L Roediger
Journal:  Am Psychol       Date:  1990-09

6.  Measuring automatic retrieval: a comparison of implicit memory, process dissociation, and speeded response procedures.

Authors:  Keith D Horton; Daryl E Wilson; Jennifer Vonk; Sarah L Kirby; Tina Nielsen
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  2005-03-25

7.  Levels of processing and selective attention effects on encoding in memory.

Authors:  S Bentin; M Moscovitch; O Nirhod
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1998-04

8.  The mere exposure effect is differentially sensitive to different judgment tasks.

Authors:  J G Seamon; P A McKenna; N Binder
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-03

9.  Evidence for multiple mechanisms of conceptual priming on implicit memory tests.

Authors:  C J Vaidya; J D Gabrieli; M M Keane; L A Monti; H Gutiérrez-Rivas; M M Zarella
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1997-11       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 10.  Priming effects of amnesia: evidence for a dissociable memory function.

Authors:  A P Shimamura
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1986-11
View more
  1 in total

1.  Does survival processing enhance implicit memory?

Authors:  Chi-Shing Tse; Jeanette Altarriba
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2010-12
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.