Literature DB >> 18034770

Double-blind studies are not always optimum for evaluation of a novel therapy: the case of new anticoagulants.

H R Büller1, J L Halperin, H Bounameaux, M Prins.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18034770     DOI: 10.1111/j.1538-7836.2007.02848.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thromb Haemost        ISSN: 1538-7836            Impact factor:   5.824


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Clinical trial design in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: current perspectives and considerations with regard to blinding of tiotropium.

Authors:  Kai-Michael Beeh; Jutta Beier; James F Donohue
Journal:  Respir Res       Date:  2012-06-22

2.  Factors influencing recruitment to research: qualitative study of the experiences and perceptions of research teams.

Authors:  Lisa Newington; Alison Metcalfe
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.615

3.  Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: direct and adjusted indirect meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Authors:  Benjamin D Fox; Susan R Kahn; David Langleben; Mark J Eisenberg; Avi Shimony
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-11-13
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.