Literature DB >> 18034616

Patients' and healthcare professionals' views on pharmacogenetic testing and its future delivery in the NHS.

Emily A Fargher1, Charlotte Eddy, William Newman, Faieza Qasim, Karen Tricker, Rachel A Elliott, Katherine Payne.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: There is limited empirical evidence on patients' and healthcare professionals' views on the provision of pharmacogenetic testing services. These opinions may be used to shape the development of emerging pharmacogenetic services and inform healthcare professionals' future educational requirements.
OBJECTIVES: To explore patients' and healthcare professionals' views about pharmacogenetic testing services and their future development.
METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with patients who had been prescribed azathioprine for autoimmune conditions and prevention of acute rejection in renal transplantation. Focus groups were conducted with a range of healthcare professionals. Interviews and focus groups were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Data were analyzed using the constant comparative method.
RESULTS: The views of 42 individuals - 25 patients and 17 healthcare professionals - were explored in depth. Key themes emerging from the data were: patients' and healthcare professionals' knowledge and experience of pharmacogenetics; expectations about how such a testing service could be used; and characteristics of service delivery. Knowledge and experience of pharmacogenetics varied. Pharmacogenetics was perceived to be of benefit by both groups. Patients gave opinions about pharmacogenetic services based on their experiences of illness, taking medicines and using healthcare services. Healthcare professionals based their opinions on how existing services are provided and access to limited healthcare resources. Patients had strong feelings about how this service should be delivered and expected high standards of explanation about potential pharmacogenetic tests. None of the healthcare professionals questioned expected to have responsibility for the future delivery of pharmacogenetic testing services.
CONCLUSION: There is no clear model of how pharmacogenetic tests will be delivered in clinical practice. Patients expect to receive pharmacogenetic services from healthcare professionals who are able to explain the test, and interpret the implications for prescribing, with confidence. The gap between patients' high expectations for information and healthcare professionals' current knowledge and reluctance to deliver pharmacogenetic services highlights the urgent need for better education and training of healthcare professionals in pharmacogenetics.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18034616     DOI: 10.2217/14622416.8.11.1511

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacogenomics        ISSN: 1462-2416            Impact factor:   2.533


  43 in total

1.  Practical considerations to guide development of access controls and decision support for genetic information in electronic medical records.

Authors:  Diana C Darcy; Eleanor T Lewis; Kelly E Ormond; David J Clark; Jodie A Trafton
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2011-11-02       Impact factor: 2.655

2.  Delivering a pharmacogenetic service: is there a role for genetic counselors?

Authors:  Alice Callard; William Newman; Katherine Payne
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2011-11-04       Impact factor: 2.537

Review 3.  Recent progress and clinical importance on pharmacogenetics in cancer therapy.

Authors:  Thomas I Peng Soh; Wei Peng Yong; Federico Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Chem Lab Med       Date:  2011-09-28       Impact factor: 3.694

4.  Assessment of patient perceptions of genomic testing to inform pharmacogenomic implementation.

Authors:  Yee Ming Lee; Ryan P McKillip; Brittany A Borden; Catherine E Klammer; Mark J Ratain; Peter H O'Donnell
Journal:  Pharmacogenet Genomics       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.089

5.  Pharmacogenetics education in British medical schools.

Authors:  Jenny E Higgs; Julie Andrews; David Gurwitz; Katherine Payne; William Newman
Journal:  Genomic Med       Date:  2009-04-12

6.  On the readiness of physicians for pharmacogenomics testing: an empirical assessment.

Authors:  N Amara; J Blouin-Bougie; D Bouthillier; J Simard
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics J       Date:  2017-06-13       Impact factor: 3.550

Review 7.  A review of consent practices and perspectives for pharmacogenetic testing.

Authors:  Susanne B Haga; Rachel Mills
Journal:  Pharmacogenomics       Date:  2016-08-17       Impact factor: 2.533

8.  Physicians' attitudes toward pharmacogenetic testing before and after pharmacogenetic education.

Authors:  Jasmine A Luzum; Matthew J Luzum
Journal:  Per Med       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 2.512

9.  An Effective Approach to Teaching Pharmacogenomics in the First Year of Pharmacy Curriculum.

Authors:  Marina Gálvez-Peralta; Grazyna D Szklarz; Werner J Geldenhuys; Paul R Lockman
Journal:  Am J Pharm Educ       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 2.047

Review 10.  Understanding patient and provider perceptions and expectations of genomic medicine.

Authors:  Michael J Hall; Andrea D Forman; Susan V Montgomery; Kim L Rainey; Mary B Daly
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-07-03       Impact factor: 3.454

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.