BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine whether a web-based, on-line intravenous insulin (IVI) infusion calculator (IVIIC) program for the delivery of IVI therapy in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients was superior to a prior IVI protocol used in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit at our institution. METHODS: The study included 97 CABG patients studied from October 2004 to February 2005 pre-protocol (type 2 diabetes) and October 2005 to February 2006 post-protocol (with or without type 2 diabetes). The IVIIC was programmed to resemble an algorithm whereby any patient with type 2 diabetes or a blood glucose (BG) greater than 120 mg/dL was started on IVI with an insulin sensitivity factor, a multiplier of 0.03. The calculator used the following mathematical formula: rate of insulin infusion/hour = (current BG - 60 mg/dL) x 0.03. RESULTS: Pre- and post-protocol groups for patients with type 2 diabetes were similar in all demographics measured, including initial age, mean age, percentage female, and percentage African-American. Significant differences were observed between pre- and post-protocol groups in mean BG recorded over a 48-h period (P < 0.0001), percentage not at target within 48 h (P < 0.0001), mean hours to first BG between 80 to 120 mg/dL (P < 0.0001), mean hours to target (three consecutive BGs 80-120 mg/dL) (P < 0.0001), and hyperglycemic index (P < 0.0001). The incidence of hypoglycemia (percentage BG < 70 mg/dL) was not significantly increased in the post-protocol groups (P = 0.2581). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the IVIIC is a safe nurse-driven protocol with excellent BG outcomes.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine whether a web-based, on-line intravenous insulin (IVI) infusion calculator (IVIIC) program for the delivery of IVI therapy in coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) patients was superior to a prior IVI protocol used in the cardiothoracic intensive care unit at our institution. METHODS: The study included 97 CABG patients studied from October 2004 to February 2005 pre-protocol (type 2 diabetes) and October 2005 to February 2006 post-protocol (with or without type 2 diabetes). The IVIIC was programmed to resemble an algorithm whereby any patient with type 2 diabetes or a blood glucose (BG) greater than 120 mg/dL was started on IVI with an insulin sensitivity factor, a multiplier of 0.03. The calculator used the following mathematical formula: rate of insulin infusion/hour = (current BG - 60 mg/dL) x 0.03. RESULTS: Pre- and post-protocol groups for patients with type 2 diabetes were similar in all demographics measured, including initial age, mean age, percentage female, and percentage African-American. Significant differences were observed between pre- and post-protocol groups in mean BG recorded over a 48-h period (P < 0.0001), percentage not at target within 48 h (P < 0.0001), mean hours to first BG between 80 to 120 mg/dL (P < 0.0001), mean hours to target (three consecutive BGs 80-120 mg/dL) (P < 0.0001), and hyperglycemic index (P < 0.0001). The incidence of hypoglycemia (percentage BG < 70 mg/dL) was not significantly increased in the post-protocol groups (P = 0.2581). CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the IVIIC is a safe nurse-driven protocol with excellent BG outcomes.
Authors: Georgia M Davis; Rodolfo J Galindo; Alexandra L Migdal; Guillermo E Umpierrez Journal: Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am Date: 2020-03 Impact factor: 4.741
Authors: Thomas R Campion; Addison K May; Lemuel R Waitman; Asli Ozdas; Nancy M Lorenzi; Cynthia S Gadd Journal: J Am Med Inform Assoc Date: 2011-03-14 Impact factor: 4.497
Authors: Rickey E Carter; Yan Lin; Stuart R Lipsitz; Robert G Newcombe; Kathie L Hermayer Journal: J R Stat Soc Ser C Appl Stat Date: 2010-08-01 Impact factor: 1.864
Authors: Thomas R Campion; Lemuel R Waitman; Addison K May; Asli Ozdas; Nancy M Lorenzi; Cynthia S Gadd Journal: Int J Med Inform Date: 2009-10-07 Impact factor: 4.046
Authors: N D Kruyt; G J Biessels; T M Vriesendorp; J H Devries; J B L Hoekstra; P W Elbers; L J Kappelle; P Portegies; M Vermeulen; Y B W E M Roos Journal: Neurocrit Care Date: 2009-05-27 Impact factor: 3.210