Literature DB >> 18034359

Clinicopathologic characteristics and malignant potential of colorectal flat neoplasia compared with that of polypoid neoplasia.

Dong Hun Park1, Hyun Soo Kim, Won Ho Kim, Tae Il Kim, Young Ho Kim, Dong Il Park, Hyo Jong Kim, Suk-Kyun Yang, Jeong-Sik Byeon, Moon Sung Lee, Il Kwun Chung, Sung Ae Jung, Yoon Tae Jeen, Jai Hyun Choi, Hwang Choi, Dong Soo Han.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Because of their potential for malignancy, flat colorectal neoplasias are a current topic of debate. This study was designed to investigate the clinicopathologic features of flat neoplasia and to compare them with those of polypoid neoplasia, as well as to identify the determinants of malignant transformation of both flat and polypoid colorectal neoplasia.
METHODS: A prospective, cross-sectional study of 3,360 patients diagnosed with adenomas via total colonoscopy and polypectomy was performed at 11 tertiary medical centers between July 2003 and July 2004. In this study, potential risk factors for malignant transformation were analyzed. If multiple adenomas were identified, then only the adenoma with the most advanced degree of histology was recorded for the patient.
RESULTS: Of a total of 3,360 neoplasias identified, we found that the incidence of flat and polypoid neoplasias were 207 (6.2 percent) and 3,153 (93.8 percent), respectively. Patients with flat neoplasias tended to be older (59.6 vs. 57.1, P < 0.01), with the neoplasia located more frequently in the right colon than polypoid neoplasias (49.3 percent vs. 32 percent, P < 0.01). The incidence of high-grade dysplasia or cancer in flat neoplasias was similar to that of polypoid neoplasias (5.4 percent vs. 4.6 percent, P = 0.36). Multivariate analysis revealed that a size of > or =11 mm (odds ratio, 6.8; 95 percent confidence interval, 4.8-9.7) and location in the left colon (odds ratio, 1.6; 95 percent confidence interval, 1.1-2.4) were significant determinants for the malignancy potential of colonic neoplasias.
CONCLUSIONS: The clinicopathologic indices for the propensity of malignant transformation in colorectal neoplasias were a size > or =11 mm and location in the left colon rather than flat gross morphology.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18034359     DOI: 10.1007/s10350-007-9091-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dis Colon Rectum        ISSN: 0012-3706            Impact factor:   4.585


  14 in total

Review 1.  Endoscopy and polyps-diagnostic and therapeutic advances in management.

Authors:  Scott R Steele; Eric K Johnson; Bradley Champagne; Brad Davis; Sang Lee; David Rivadeneira; Howard Ross; Dana A Hayden; Justin A Maykel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-07-21       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 2.  Colon cleansing before colonoscopy: does oral sodium phosphate solution still make sense?

Authors:  D K Rex; S J Vanner
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.522

3.  Suboptimal Bowel Preparation Significantly Impairs Colonoscopic Detection of Non-polypoid Colorectal Neoplasms.

Authors:  Chi Hyuk Oh; Chang Kyun Lee; Jung-Wook Kim; Jae-Jun Shim; Jae Young Jang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2015-03-17       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Association of smoking and flat adenomas: results from an asymptomatic population screened with a high-definition colonoscope.

Authors:  Joseph C Anderson; Benjamin Stein; Charles J Kahi; Ramona Rajapakse; Grace Walker; Zvi Alpern
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2010-04-24       Impact factor: 9.427

Review 5.  Current concepts in colorectal cancer prevention.

Authors:  Patricia A Thompson; Eugene W Gerner
Journal:  Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 3.869

6.  Multicentre randomised controlled trial comparing standard and high resolution optical technologies in colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Simona Di Caro; Lucia Fini; Roser Vega; Konstantinos C Fragkos; Sunil Dolwani; John Green; Lesley-Ann Smith; Conrad Beckett; Ewen Cameron; Matthew Banks
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2019-02-26

7.  Preinvasive colorectal lesion transcriptomes correlate with endoscopic morphology (polypoid vs. nonpolypoid).

Authors:  Elisa Cattaneo; Endre Laczko; Federico Buffoli; Fausto Zorzi; Maria Antonia Bianco; Mirco Menigatti; Zdena Bartosova; Ritva Haider; Birgit Helmchen; Jacob Sabates-Bellver; Amit Tiwari; Josef Jiricny; Giancarlo Marra
Journal:  EMBO Mol Med       Date:  2011-05-03       Impact factor: 12.137

8.  The Immune Landscapes of Polypoid and Nonpolypoid Precancerous Colorectal Lesions.

Authors:  Antonella Maglietta; Rosalia Maglietta; Teresa Staiano; Ramona Bertoni; Nicola Ancona; Giancarlo Marra; Leonardo Resta
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Risk factors of missed colorectal lesions after colonoscopy.

Authors:  Jeonghun Lee; Sung Won Park; You Sun Kim; Kyung Jin Lee; Hyun Sung; Pil Hun Song; Won Jae Yoon; Jeong Seop Moon
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 1.889

10.  Minimal invasive surgery in treatment of liver metastases from colorectal carcinomas: case studies and survival rates.

Authors:  Domenico Loffredo; Alberto Marvaso; Sandro Ceraso; Nicola Cinelli; Aldo Rocca; Mario Vitale; Michele Rossi; Eugenio Genovese; Bruno Amato; Mariapia Cinelli
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 2.102

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.