BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE: Piracetam was a candidate neuroprotective drug for acute stroke ineffective in clinical trial. Here we use systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the evidence supporting a protective effect of piracetam and its derivatives in animal models of stroke. METHODS: We present a systematic review of reports describing the use of piracetam and its derivatives in animal models of focal ischaemia, where the outcome was measured as an infarct size or neurological score (Der Simonian and Laird random effects meta-analysis). RESULTS: Only 2 studies, published 10 years after the first clinical trial of piracetam had been initiated, described its efficacy in animal models of stroke. A further 4 studies described the efficacy of related compounds. Piracetam and its derivatives improved the outcome by 30.2% (95% CI = 16.1-44.4). The median study quality was 4/10 (inter-quartile range = 4-6). CONCLUSION: Piracetam and its derivatives demonstrate neuroprotective efficacy in experimental stroke, but our findings raise concerns about the amount of available data, the quality of the studies and publication bias. (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
BACKGROUND/ OBJECTIVE:Piracetam was a candidate neuroprotective drug for acute stroke ineffective in clinical trial. Here we use systematic review and meta-analysis to describe the evidence supporting a protective effect of piracetam and its derivatives in animal models of stroke. METHODS: We present a systematic review of reports describing the use of piracetam and its derivatives in animal models of focal ischaemia, where the outcome was measured as an infarct size or neurological score (Der Simonian and Laird random effects meta-analysis). RESULTS: Only 2 studies, published 10 years after the first clinical trial of piracetam had been initiated, described its efficacy in animal models of stroke. A further 4 studies described the efficacy of related compounds. Piracetam and its derivatives improved the outcome by 30.2% (95% CI = 16.1-44.4). The median study quality was 4/10 (inter-quartile range = 4-6). CONCLUSION:Piracetam and its derivatives demonstrate neuroprotective efficacy in experimental stroke, but our findings raise concerns about the amount of available data, the quality of the studies and publication bias. (c) 2007 S. Karger AG, Basel.
Authors: Alicia Aliena-Valero; Júlia Baixauli-Martín; María Castelló-Ruiz; Germán Torregrosa; David Hervás; Juan B Salom Journal: J Cereb Blood Flow Metab Date: 2020-11-19 Impact factor: 6.200
Authors: Story C Landis; Susan G Amara; Khusru Asadullah; Chris P Austin; Robi Blumenstein; Eileen W Bradley; Ronald G Crystal; Robert B Darnell; Robert J Ferrante; Howard Fillit; Robert Finkelstein; Marc Fisher; Howard E Gendelman; Robert M Golub; John L Goudreau; Robert A Gross; Amelie K Gubitz; Sharon E Hesterlee; David W Howells; John Huguenard; Katrina Kelner; Walter Koroshetz; Dimitri Krainc; Stanley E Lazic; Michael S Levine; Malcolm R Macleod; John M McCall; Richard T Moxley; Kalyani Narasimhan; Linda J Noble; Steve Perrin; John D Porter; Oswald Steward; Ellis Unger; Ursula Utz; Shai D Silberberg Journal: Nature Date: 2012-10-11 Impact factor: 49.962
Authors: Emily S Sena; H Bart van der Worp; Philip M W Bath; David W Howells; Malcolm R Macleod Journal: PLoS Biol Date: 2010-03-30 Impact factor: 8.029
Authors: Jennifer A Hirst; Jeremy Howick; Jeffrey K Aronson; Nia Roberts; Rafael Perera; Constantinos Koshiaris; Carl Heneghan Journal: PLoS One Date: 2014-06-06 Impact factor: 3.240