Literature DB >> 18032819

A comparative study of the effect of hydrogen peroxide versus normal saline on the strength of the bone-cement interface.

S R Guerin1, R MacNiochaill, P O'Reilly, J O'Byrne, D J Kelly.   

Abstract

Hydrogen peroxide has been used for decades as an effervescent haemostatic agent in arthroplasty. Recently it has been shown to adversely affect the material properties of PMMA. We aim to assess whether any such deleterious effects are demonstrated in an experimental model which mimics the clinical use of hydrogen peroxide. Matched pairs of cancellous bone samples were treated with a swab soaked in either saline or a 3% solution of hydrogen peroxide, prior to manufacture of cement-bone constructs using Palacos or Simplex cement. Thirty pairs were then compared by subjecting them to a torsional shear force until failure and a further thirty pairs were tested to failure in tension. There was no significant difference between the mean torques to failure for the Palacos-peroxide group versus the Palacos-saline group, or the Simplex-peroxide versus the Simplex-saline group (p=0.31 and 0.71 respectively). Similarly there was no significant difference between the mean tension loads to failure for the Palacos-peroxide group versus the Palacos-saline group, and the Simplex-peroxide versus the Simplex-saline group (p=0.79 and 0.23 respectively). We conclude that the use of hydrogen peroxide as an effervescent haemostatic agent has no detrimental effect on the mechanical integrity of the bone-cement interface when compared to normal saline.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18032819

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Mater Eng        ISSN: 0959-2989            Impact factor:   1.300


  3 in total

1.  NOX4 blockade suppresses titanium nanoparticle-induced bone destruction via activation of the Nrf2 signaling pathway.

Authors:  Wei Wang; Xiaolong Liang; Xin Liu; Jiaxiang Bai; Wei Zhang; Wenming Li; Tianhao Wang; Meng Li; Zerui Wu; Liang Chen; Huilin Yang; Ye Gu; Yunxia Tao; Jun Zhou; Huaiyu Wang; Dechun Geng
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 9.429

Review 2.  A Review of PMMA Bone Cement and Intra-Cardiac Embolism.

Authors:  Puneeth Shridhar; Yanfei Chen; Ramzi Khalil; Anton Plakseychuk; Sung Kwon Cho; Bryan Tillman; Prashant N Kumta; YoungJae Chun
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.623

3.  The cement-bone bond is weaker than cement-cement bond in cement-in-cement revision arthroplasty. A comparative biomechanical study.

Authors:  Marcin Ceynowa; Krzysztof Zerdzicki; Pawel Klosowski; Maciej Zrodowski; Rafal Pankowski; Marek Roclawski; Tomasz Mazurek
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.