OBJECTIVE: This study assessed a newly set-up, hospital-based smoking cessation clinic with regard to continuous abstinence rates and the effectiveness of concomittant nicotine replacement therapy. METHODS: Smoking status of 369 participants of this 8-week cognitive-behavioural smoking cessation group programme was obtained using exhaled carbon monoxide at the end of the course as well as self-report 6 months after the course. In addition to demographic data, FTND score, SDS score, and usage of nicotine replacement products were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 29.8% of all participants reported to have been continuously abstinent for 6 months after the course. Success rates increased significantly during the first year after initiation of the programme (from 15 to 35%, p<0.001), indicating a learning process of the staff running the course. Nicotine replacement therapy was used by 51.3% of participants, but 58% of these discontinued its use within 5 weeks. Nicotine substitution for more than 5 weeks was associated with a 50% success rate after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate a learning effect of smoking cessation course staff and a possible minimum duration required for nicotine replacement to be effective. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The observed learning effect in smoking cessation programmes should be considered when evaluating newly established interventions of this kind. Patients tend to stop nicotine replacement therapy too early, thereby decreasing their chances of middle-term abstinence.
OBJECTIVE: This study assessed a newly set-up, hospital-based smoking cessation clinic with regard to continuous abstinence rates and the effectiveness of concomittant nicotine replacement therapy. METHODS: Smoking status of 369 participants of this 8-week cognitive-behavioural smoking cessation group programme was obtained using exhaled carbon monoxide at the end of the course as well as self-report 6 months after the course. In addition to demographic data, FTND score, SDS score, and usage of nicotine replacement products were recorded. RESULTS: Overall, 29.8% of all participants reported to have been continuously abstinent for 6 months after the course. Success rates increased significantly during the first year after initiation of the programme (from 15 to 35%, p<0.001), indicating a learning process of the staff running the course. Nicotine replacement therapy was used by 51.3% of participants, but 58% of these discontinued its use within 5 weeks. Nicotine substitution for more than 5 weeks was associated with a 50% success rate after 6 months. CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate a learning effect of smoking cessation course staff and a possible minimum duration required for nicotine replacement to be effective. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: The observed learning effect in smoking cessation programmes should be considered when evaluating newly established interventions of this kind. Patients tend to stop nicotine replacement therapy too early, thereby decreasing their chances of middle-term abstinence.
Authors: Tanya R Schlam; Timothy B Baker; Stevens S Smith; Daniel M Bolt; Danielle E McCarthy; Jessica W Cook; Todd Hayes-Birchler; Michael C Fiore; Megan E Piper Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Yvette Leung; Gil G Kaplan; Kevin P Rioux; James Hubbard; Sarah Kamhawi; Lidia Stasiak; Russell D Cohen; Shane M Devlin; Remo Panaccione; Stephen B Hanauer; David T Rubin Journal: Dig Dis Sci Date: 2012-02-07 Impact factor: 3.199
Authors: Mohammad Siahpush; Raees A Shaikh; Molly McCarthy; Asia Sikora Kessler; Melissa Tibbits; Gopal K Singh Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2015-01-13 Impact factor: 2.692
Authors: Ming Wei Tang; Richard Oakley; Catherine Dale; Arnie Purushotham; Henrik Møller; Jennifer Elizabeth Gallagher Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2014-12-20 Impact factor: 2.655