Literature DB >> 18031555

Evolution in ecological field experiments: implications for effect size.

Sharon Y Strauss1, Jennifer A Lau, Thomas W Schoener, Peter Tiffin.   

Abstract

Rapid evolution in response to strong selection, much of which is human-induced, has been indisputably documented. In this perspective, we suggest that adaptation may influence the effect size of treatments in ecological field experiments and alter our predictions of future dynamics in ecological systems. Field experiments often impose very strong and consistent selection over multiple generations. Focal populations may adapt to these treatments and, in the process, increase or decrease the magnitude of the treatment effect through time. We argue that how effect size changes through time will depend on the evolutionary history of the experimental population, the type of experimental manipulation, and the traits involved in adaptive responses. While no field study has conclusively demonstrated evolution in response to treatments with concomitant changes in ecological effect size, we present several examples that provide strong circumstantial evidence that such effects occur. We conclude with a consideration of the differences between plastic and genetic responses to treatments and discuss future research directions linking adaptation to ecological effect size.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18031555     DOI: 10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01128.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ecol Lett        ISSN: 1461-023X            Impact factor:   9.492


  8 in total

1.  Rapid contemporary evolution and clonal food web dynamics.

Authors:  Laura E Jones; Lutz Becks; Stephen P Ellner; Nelson G Hairston; Takehito Yoshida; Gregor F Fussmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-06-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Invasive species cause large-scale loss of native California oyster habitat by disrupting trophic cascades.

Authors:  David L Kimbro; Edwin D Grosholz; Adam J Baukus; Nicholas J Nesbitt; Nicole M Travis; Sarikka Attoe; Caitlin Coleman-Hulbert
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2009-04-08       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Selection for niche differentiation in plant communities increases biodiversity effects.

Authors:  Debra Zuppinger-Dingley; Bernhard Schmid; Jana S Petermann; Varuna Yadav; Gerlinde B De Deyn; Dan F B Flynn
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Evolutionary origins for ecological patterns in space.

Authors:  Mark C Urban; Sharon Y Strauss; Fanie Pelletier; Eric P Palkovacs; Mathew A Leibold; Andrew P Hendry; Luc De Meester; Stephanie M Carlson; Amy L Angert; Sean T Giery
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-07-08       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  The relative importance of rapid evolution for plant-microbe interactions depends on ecological context.

Authors:  Casey P Terhorst; Jay T Lennon; Jennifer A Lau
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Contemporary evolution rivals the effects of rhizobium presence on community and ecosystem properties in experimental mesocosms.

Authors:  Jennifer A Lau; Mark D Hammond; Jennifer E Schmidt; Dylan J Weese; Wendy H Yang; Katy D Heath
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 3.298

7.  Eco-evolutionary Model of Rapid Phenotypic Diversification in Species-Rich Communities.

Authors:  Paula Villa Martín; Jorge Hidalgo; Rafael Rubio de Casas; Miguel A Muñoz
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 4.475

8.  Ecological and evolutionary effects of stickleback on community structure.

Authors:  Simone Des Roches; Jonathan B Shurin; Dolph Schluter; Luke J Harmon
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-04-03       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.