Literature DB >> 18031418

When gains loom larger than losses: reversed loss aversion for small amounts of money.

Fieke Harinck1, Eric Van Dijk, Ilja Van Beest, Paul Mersmann.   

Abstract

Previous research has generally shown that people are loss averse; that is, they weigh losses more heavily than gains. In a series of three experiments, we found that for small outcomes, this pattern is reversed, and gains loom larger than losses. We explain this reversal on the basis of (a) the hedonic principle, which states that individuals are motivated to maximize pleasure and to minimize pain, and (b) the assumption that small losses are more easily discounted cognitively than large losses are.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18031418     DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02031.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychol Sci        ISSN: 0956-7976


  18 in total

Review 1.  The current status of research on the structure of evaluative space.

Authors:  Catherine J Norris; Jackie Gollan; Gary G Berntson; John T Cacioppo
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 3.251

2.  Monetary losses do not loom large in later life: age differences in the framing effect.

Authors:  Joseph A Mikels; Andrew E Reed
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2009-06-04       Impact factor: 4.077

3.  THE POSITIVITY OFFSET THEORY OF ANHEDONIA IN SCHIZOPHRENIA.

Authors:  Gregory P Strauss; Katherine H Frost; Bern G Lee; James M Gold
Journal:  Clin Psychol Sci       Date:  2017-03-10

4.  Delay discounting of losses and rewards in alcohol use disorder: The effect of working memory load.

Authors:  Allen J Bailey; Kyle Gerst; Peter R Finn
Journal:  Psychol Addict Behav       Date:  2018-01-22

5.  The effect of framing incentives as either losses or gains with contingency management for smoking cessation.

Authors:  Paul Romanowich; R J Lamb
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2013-01-17       Impact factor: 3.913

6.  The adaptive value of probability distortion and risk-seeking in macaques' decision-making.

Authors:  A Nioche; N P Rougier; M Deffains; S Bourgeois-Gironde; S Ballesta; T Boraud
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2021-01-11       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Who's been framed? Framing effects are reduced in financial gambles made for others.

Authors:  Fenja V Ziegler; Richard J Tunney
Journal:  BMC Psychol       Date:  2015-04-02

8.  Contextual factors explain risk-seeking preferences in rhesus monkeys.

Authors:  Sarah R Heilbronner; Benjamin Y Hayden
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2013-02-01       Impact factor: 4.677

9.  Retrieval, monitoring, and control processes: a 7 tesla FMRI approach to memory accuracy.

Authors:  Uda-Mareke Risius; Angelica Staniloiu; Martina Piefke; Stefan Maderwald; Frank P Schulte; Matthias Brand; Hans J Markowitsch
Journal:  Front Behav Neurosci       Date:  2013-04-08       Impact factor: 3.558

10.  Decision making for animal health and welfare: integrating risk-benefit analysis with prospect theory.

Authors:  Helena Hansson; Carl Johan Lagerkvist
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 4.000

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.