Literature DB >> 18030434

[Esophageal carcinoma. Results after esophageal resection].

I Gastinger1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The central element of the multimodal therapy concept for esophageal carcinomas is operative resection. This is a complex visceral surgical intervention that calls for standardized and interdisciplinary perioperative management. Continuous control of results is essential for evaluating therapy concepts.
METHOD: Data of patients who had undergone thoracoabdominal resection of an esophageal carcinoma were recorded and evaluated in a prospective single center study within the framework of internal quality control.
RESULTS: In the time span between 1 January 1997 and 31 December 2005, 193 patients with esophageal carcinoma were treated. Of these, 97 (50.7%) received single-stage abdominothoracal resection without neoadjuvant primary therapy. In 70% of these cases, an advanced tumor stage was present (UICC IIb or higher). R0 resection was achieved in 83 patients (85.5%). The rate of hospital mortality was found to be 6.2% (n=6). In a follow-up examination rate of 95.6%, an overall 5-year survival rate of 25% was found for all resected patients and 30% for those who received curative resection.
CONCLUSION: The long-term results reached by surgery alone are comparable to those published in the current literature but are still not satisfying. A more individual approach to therapy with increased selection of patients for the application of modern neoadjuvant concepts could lead to an improvement in prognosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18030434     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-007-1402-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  8 in total

1.  [How safe is high intrathoracic esophagogastrostomy?].

Authors:  A H Hölscher; W Schröder; E Bollschweiler; K T E Beckurts; P M Schneider
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.955

2.  [Neoadjuvant therapy for squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus].

Authors:  F Lordick
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  [Perioperative chemotherapy vs. surgery alone in resectable gastroesophageal carcinomas. Results of the MAGIC study].

Authors:  F Lordick; J R Siewert
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 0.955

4.  Critical appraisal of the significance of intrathoracic anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy for cancer.

Authors:  B P Whooley; S Law; A Alexandrou; S C Murthy; J Wong
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  [Esophagectomy as therapeutic principle for squamous cell esophageal cancer].

Authors:  J R Siewert; M Feith; H J Stein
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 0.955

6.  [Anastomotic leaks in the upper gastrointestinal tract].

Authors:  J R Siewert; H J Stein; H Bartels
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  [Changes and complication rate in surgery for thoracic esophageal carcinoma].

Authors:  T Meyer; S Merkel; J Göhl; P Stumpf; W Hohenberger
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 0.942

8.  An evaluation of prognostic factors and tumor staging of resected carcinoma of the esophagus.

Authors:  Bas P L Wijnhoven; Khe T C Tran; Adrian Esterman; David I Watson; Hugo W Tilanus
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 12.969

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.