Literature DB >> 18029861

Müllerian duct anomalies: comparison of MRI diagnosis and clinical diagnosis.

Gisela C Mueller1, Hero K Hussain, Yolanda R Smith, Elisabeth H Quint, Ruth C Carlos, Timothy D Johnson, John O DeLancey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The objective of our study was to assess agreement between MRI and clinical diagnosis of müllerian duct anomalies and identify causes of discrepancy.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Images of 103 patients who underwent MRI for suspected müllerian duct anomaly were reviewed. Imaging included axial T1-weighted spin-echo (SE) (TR/TE, 500/10) and sagittal, long-uterine-axis, and short-uterine-axis T2-weighted fast SE (5,000/80) sequences. Agreement between original MRI diagnosis and final clinical diagnosis was assessed using the kappa statistic. Two radiologists retrospectively reviewed all cases with inconsistent MRI and clinical diagnoses to identify causes of discrepancy.
RESULTS: There was excellent agreement (kappa = 0.8) between MRI and clinical diagnoses of müllerian duct anomalies. For evaluation of the uterus, there was agreement in 83 of 103 patients, disagreement in 15 of 103, and agreement could not be determined in five of 103 because of uncertain MRI diagnoses. The main causes of disagreement were MRI diagnosis of septate uteri with two cervices clinically diagnosed as didelphic, partial septate uteri clinically diagnosed as arcuate, and complex anomalies with features of more than one class. The main difficulties for MRI were the detection of small uteri or remnants, characterization of cervical dysgenesis and rare anomalies, overestimation of cervical mucosal folds, characterization of anomalies in the presence of fibroids, and delineation of vaginal abnormalities.
CONCLUSION: Despite excellent agreement between MRI and clinical diagnoses of müllerian duct anomalies, there are discrepancies and pitfalls resulting mostly from the absence of a precise and integrated classification scheme, unfamiliarity with rare and complex entities, and suboptimal depiction of some structures on MRI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18029861     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.2494

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  13 in total

Review 1.  Mullerian duct anomalies: from diagnosis to intervention.

Authors:  T M Chandler; L S Machan; P L Cooperberg; A C Harris; S D Chang
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2009-05-11       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  The spectrum of imaging appearances of müllerian duct anomalies: focus on MR imaging.

Authors:  Takeru Fukunaga; Shinya Fujii; Chie Inoue; Naoko Mukuda; Atsushi Murakami; Yoshio Tanabe; Tasuku Harada; Toshihide Ogawa
Journal:  Jpn J Radiol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.374

Review 3.  Endometrial cancer with congenital uterine anomalies: 3 case reports and a literature review.

Authors:  Jinping Gao; Jintian Zhang; Wenyan Tian; Fei Teng; Huiying Zhang; Xuhong Zhang; Yingmei Wang; Fengxia Xue
Journal:  Cancer Biol Ther       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 4.742

4.  Large leiomyoma in a woman with Mayer-Rokitansky-Kuster-Hauser syndrome.

Authors:  Kishan S Rawat; Tbs Buxi; Anurag Yadav; Samarjit S Ghuman; Shashi Dhawan
Journal:  J Radiol Case Rep       Date:  2013-03-01

Review 5.  Magnetic resonance imaging of Müllerian anomalies in girls: concepts and controversies.

Authors:  Amanda G Rivas; Monica Epelman; Pamela I Ellsworth; Daniel J Podberesky; Sharon W Gould
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2021-06-21

6.  Mayer-rokitansky-kuster-hauser syndrome: embryology, genetics and clinical and surgical treatment.

Authors:  Alfonsa Pizzo; Antonio Simone Laganà; Emanuele Sturlese; Giovanni Retto; Annalisa Retto; Rosanna De Dominici; Domenico Puzzolo
Journal:  ISRN Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-02-04

7.  The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies.

Authors:  Grigoris F Grimbizis; Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo; Sotirios H Saravelos; Stephan Gordts; Caterina Exacoustos; Dominique Van Schoubroeck; Carmina Bermejo; Nazar N Amso; Geeta Nargund; Dirk Timmermann; Apostolos Athanasiadis; Sara Brucker; Carlo De Angelis; Marco Gergolet; Tin Chiu Li; Vasilios Tanos; Basil Tarlatzis; Roy Farquharson; Luca Gianaroli; Rudi Campo
Journal:  Gynecol Surg       Date:  2015-11-04

8.  Congenital Obstructive Müllerian Anomaly: The Pitfalls of a Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Diagnosis and the Importance of Intraoperative Biopsy.

Authors:  Do Young Kim; Gina Nam; Sa Ra Lee; Sung Hoon Kim; Hee Dong Chae; Byung Moon Kang
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2021-05-29       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Bilateral ectopic hypoplastic uteri attached to bilateral pelvic sidewalls in a 21-year-old patient with primary amenorrhea: the first published report.

Authors:  Ahmed Nazer; Ahmed Abu-Zaid; Osama Alomar; Hany Salem; Ayman Azzam; Ismail A Al-Badawi
Journal:  Case Rep Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-10-31

Review 10.  Magnetic resonance imaging of classified and unclassified Müllerian duct anomalies: Comparison of the American Society for Reproductive Medicine and the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology classifications.

Authors:  Devimeenal Jegannathan; Venkatraman Indiran
Journal:  SA J Radiol       Date:  2018-04-23
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.