Literature DB >> 18029815

Bacterial contamination on rubber picker fingers before, during, and after processing.

J W Arnold1.   

Abstract

Numbers of bacteria on rubber picker fingers collected from processing plants for 3 industrial processors were assessed in 3 separate trials for each plant. After 5 d in use, picker fingers were removed from the front, center, and back of an inline picker, including locations to the right and left of the processing line. Assessment indicated that the levels of bacteria present immediately after processing vary widely. Bacterial density on picker finger sections ranged from log(10) cfu = 0 to 5.41 in 2 of the 3 processing plants from which picker fingers were obtained. Higher counts (ranging from log(10) cfu = 3.23 to 7.33) were assessed on picker fingers from a third plant. The effect of location of fingers in the picker machine on bacterial counts was tested in 2 trials at each of 2 processing plants. There was no difference between the counts on fingers collected from the right or left of the picker machine for either plant. There was a difference (P < 0.05) among the counts on fingers collected in the forward direction, from front, center, and exit end, for 1 of the plants. No bacterial growth occurred in samples from new rubber picker fingers obtained from any of the processors. On rubber fingers with initially lower bacterial counts, microbial growth increased when incubated without additional disinfectant treatment. The bacterial population on used fingers incubated for 3 d significantly increased (P < 0.05) above that of bacteria on inline fingers. These results indicate that intervention early in the picking process could enhance sanitation practices and pathogen control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18029815     DOI: 10.3382/ps.2007-00187

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Poult Sci        ISSN: 0032-5791            Impact factor:   3.352


  5 in total

Review 1.  Bacterial Contaminants of Poultry Meat: Sources, Species, and Dynamics.

Authors:  Amélie Rouger; Odile Tresse; Monique Zagorec
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2017-08-25

2.  Helicobacter pylori in a poultry slaughterhouse: Prevalence, genotyping and antibiotic resistance pattern.

Authors:  Mohamed Hamada; Ayman Elbehiry; Eman Marzouk; Ihab M Moussa; Ashgan Mohamed Hessain; Jwaher Haji Alhaji; Hassan A Heme; Rasha Zahran; Eman Abdeen
Journal:  Saudi J Biol Sci       Date:  2018-02-09       Impact factor: 4.219

3.  Use of Foaming Disinfectants and Cleaners to Reduce Aerobic Bacteria and Salmonella on Poultry Transport Coops.

Authors:  Carolee Hinojosa; David Caldwell; James Byrd; Robert Droleskey; Jason Lee; Phil Stayer; Erin Resendiz; Javier Garcia; Stephanie Klein; Denise Caldwell; Megan Pineda; Morgan Farnell
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-02       Impact factor: 2.752

Review 4.  Reviewing Interventions against Enterobacteriaceae in Broiler Processing: Using Old Techniques for Meeting the New Challenges of ESBL E. coli?

Authors:  Michaela Projahn; Ewa Pacholewicz; Evelyne Becker; Guido Correia-Carreira; Niels Bandick; Annemarie Kaesbohrer
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.411

5.  Effects of subzero saline chilling on broiler chilling efficiency, meat quality, and microbial safety.

Authors:  H C Lee; M M Metheny; S Viliani; D C Bennett; S Hurley; I Kang
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 3.352

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.