RATIONALE: Microarray technology is widely employed for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying complex diseases. However, analyses of individual diseases or models of diseases frequently yield extensive lists of differentially expressed genes with uncertain relationships to disease pathogenesis. OBJECTIVES: To compare gene expression changes in a heterogeneous set of lung disease models in order to identify common gene expression changes seen in diverse forms of lung pathology, as well as relatively small subsets of genes likely to be involved in specific pathophysiological processes. METHODS: We profiled lung gene expression in 12 mouse models of infection, allergy, and lung injury. A linear model was used to estimate transcript expression changes for each model, and hierarchical clustering was used to compare expression patterns between models. Selected expression changes were verified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 transcripts, including many involved in inflammation and immune activation, were differentially expressed in a substantial majority (9 or more) of the models. Expression patterns distinguished three groups of models: (1) bacterial infection (n = 5), with changes in 89 transcripts, including many related to nuclear factor-kappaB signaling, cytokines, chemokines, and their receptors; (2) bleomycin-induced diseases (n = 2), with changes in 53 transcripts, including many related to matrix remodeling and Wnt signaling; and (3) T helper cell type 2 (allergic) inflammation (n = 5), with changes in 26 transcripts, including many encoding epithelial secreted molecules, ion channels, and transporters. CONCLUSIONS: This multimodel dataset highlights novel genes likely involved in various pathophysiological processes and will be a valuable resource for the investigation of molecular mechanisms underlying lung disease pathogenesis.
RATIONALE: Microarray technology is widely employed for studying the molecular mechanisms underlying complex diseases. However, analyses of individual diseases or models of diseases frequently yield extensive lists of differentially expressed genes with uncertain relationships to disease pathogenesis. OBJECTIVES: To compare gene expression changes in a heterogeneous set of lung disease models in order to identify common gene expression changes seen in diverse forms of lung pathology, as well as relatively small subsets of genes likely to be involved in specific pathophysiological processes. METHODS: We profiled lung gene expression in 12 mouse models of infection, allergy, and lung injury. A linear model was used to estimate transcript expression changes for each model, and hierarchical clustering was used to compare expression patterns between models. Selected expression changes were verified by quantitative polymerase chain reaction. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 24 transcripts, including many involved in inflammation and immune activation, were differentially expressed in a substantial majority (9 or more) of the models. Expression patterns distinguished three groups of models: (1) bacterial infection (n = 5), with changes in 89 transcripts, including many related to nuclear factor-kappaB signaling, cytokines, chemokines, and their receptors; (2) bleomycin-induced diseases (n = 2), with changes in 53 transcripts, including many related to matrix remodeling and Wnt signaling; and (3) T helper cell type 2 (allergic) inflammation (n = 5), with changes in 26 transcripts, including many encoding epithelial secreted molecules, ion channels, and transporters. CONCLUSIONS: This multimodel dataset highlights novel genes likely involved in various pathophysiological processes and will be a valuable resource for the investigation of molecular mechanisms underlying lung disease pathogenesis.
Authors: T S Blackwell; L H Lancaster; T R Blackwell; A Venkatakrishnan; J W Christman Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 1999-05 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: J S Munger; X Huang; H Kawakatsu; M J Griffiths; S L Dalton; J Wu; J F Pittet; N Kaminski; C Garat; M A Matthay; D B Rifkin; D Sheppard Journal: Cell Date: 1999-02-05 Impact factor: 41.582
Authors: Wen Ning; Chao-Jun Li; Naftali Kaminski; Carol A Feghali-Bostwick; Sean M Alber; Yuanpu P Di; Sherrie L Otterbein; Ruiping Song; Shizu Hayashi; Zhihong Zhou; David J Pinsky; Simon C Watkins; Joseph M Pilewski; Frank C Sciurba; David G Peters; James C Hogg; Augustine M K Choi Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2004-10-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: D B Corry; G Grünig; H Hadeiba; V P Kurup; M L Warnock; D Sheppard; D M Rennick; R M Locksley Journal: Mol Med Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 6.354
Authors: Carole R Baskin; Adolfo García-Sastre; Terrence M Tumpey; Helle Bielefeldt-Ohmann; Victoria S Carter; Estanislao Nistal-Villán; Michael G Katze Journal: J Virol Date: 2004-10 Impact factor: 5.103
Authors: Rudra Bhowmick; Tahereh Derakhshan; Yurong Liang; Jerry Ritchey; Lin Liu; Heather Gappa-Fahlenkamp Journal: Tissue Eng Part A Date: 2018-06-29 Impact factor: 3.845
Authors: Yasuhiro Nakagami; Silvio Favoreto; Guohua Zhen; Sung-Woo Park; Louis T Nguyenvu; Douglas A Kuperman; Gregory M Dolganov; Xiaozhu Huang; Homer A Boushey; Pedro C Avila; David J Erle Journal: J Immunol Date: 2008-08-01 Impact factor: 5.422
Authors: Alexander R Abbas; Janet K Jackman; Sherron L Bullens; Sarah M Davis; David F Choy; Grazyna Fedorowicz; Martha Tan; Bao-Tran Truong; Y Gloria Meng; Lauri Diehl; Lisa A Miller; Edward S Schelegle; Dallas M Hyde; Hilary F Clark; Zora Modrusan; Joseph R Arron; Lawren C Wu Journal: Am J Pathol Date: 2011-08-03 Impact factor: 4.307
Authors: Karen M Frank; Tong Zhou; Liliana Moreno-Vinasco; Brian Hollett; Joe G N Garcia; Juliane Bubeck Wardenburg Journal: Infect Immun Date: 2012-06-25 Impact factor: 3.441
Authors: Scott E Evans; Michael J Tuvim; Jiexin Zhang; Derek T Larson; Cesar D García; Sylvia Martinez-Pro; Kevin R Coombes; Burton F Dickey Journal: Respir Res Date: 2010-07-23
Authors: E Cantu; D J Lederer; K Meyer; K Milewski; Y Suzuki; R J Shah; J M Diamond; N J Meyer; J W Tobias; D A Baldwin; V M Van Deerlin; K M Olthoff; A Shaked; J D Christie Journal: Am J Transplant Date: 2013-05-24 Impact factor: 8.086