Literature DB >> 18029298

The effect of spatial structure on adaptation in Escherichia coli.

Lilia Perfeito1, M Inês Pereira, Paulo R A Campos, Isabel Gordo.   

Abstract

Populations of organisms are generally organized in a given spatial structure. However, the vast majority of population genetic studies are based on populations in which every individual competes globally. Here we use experimental evolution in Escherichia coli to directly test a recently made prediction that spatial structure slows down adaptation and that this cost increases with the mutation rate. This was studied by comparing populations of different mutation rates adapting to a liquid (unstructured) medium with populations that evolved in a Petri dish on solid (structured) medium. We find that mutators adapt faster to both environments and that adaptation is slower if there is spatial structure. We observed no significant difference in the cost of structure between mutator and wild-type populations, which suggests that clonal interference is intense in both genetic backgrounds.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18029298      PMCID: PMC2412928          DOI: 10.1098/rsbl.2007.0481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Lett        ISSN: 1744-9561            Impact factor:   3.703


  18 in total

1.  Evaluating the impact of population bottlenecks in experimental evolution.

Authors:  Lindi M Wahl; Philip J Gerrish; Ivan Saika-Voivod
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 4.562

2.  Mutational effects on the clonal interference phenomenon.

Authors:  Paulo R A Campos; Viviane M de Oliveira
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.694

3.  Adaptive radiation in a heterogeneous environment.

Authors:  P B Rainey; M Travisano
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1998-07-02       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population.

Authors:  P J Gerrish; R E Lenski
Journal:  Genetica       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.082

5.  Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations.

Authors:  J A Arjan; M Visser; C W Zeyl; P J Gerrish; J L Blanchard; R E Lenski
Journal:  Science       Date:  1999-01-15       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Evidence for multiple adaptive peaks from populations of bacteria evolving in a structured habitat.

Authors:  R Korona; C H Nakatsu; L J Forney; R E Lenski
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1994-09-13       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 7.  The bacterial glycocalyx in nature and disease.

Authors:  J W Costerton; R T Irvin; K J Cheng
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 15.500

8.  The effect of linkage on limits to artificial selection.

Authors:  W G Hill; A Robertson
Journal:  Genet Res       Date:  1966-12       Impact factor: 1.588

9.  The consequences of growth of a mutator strain of Escherichia coli as measured by loss of function among multiple gene targets and loss of fitness.

Authors:  P Funchain; A Yeung; J L Stewart; R Lin; M M Slupska; J H Miller
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 4.562

10.  Structured habitats and the evolution of anticompetitor toxins in bacteria.

Authors:  L Chao; B R Levin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1981-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  19 in total

Review 1.  The fixation probability of beneficial mutations.

Authors:  Z Patwa; L M Wahl
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Fitness benefits of low infectivity in a spatially structured population of bacteriophages.

Authors:  Pavitra Roychoudhury; Neelima Shrestha; Valorie R Wiss; Stephen M Krone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Modeling evolution of spatially distributed bacterial communities: a simulation with the haploid evolutionary constructor.

Authors:  Alexandra Klimenko; Yury Matushkin; Nikolay Kolchanov; Sergey Lashin
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2015-02-02       Impact factor: 3.260

4.  Radial Expansion Facilitates the Maintenance of Double Antibiotic Resistances.

Authors:  Paulo Durão; Ricardo S Ramiro; Cátia Pereira; Jernej Jurič; Delfina Pereira; Isabel Gordo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2020-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Interfering waves of adaptation promote spatial mixing.

Authors:  Erik A Martens; Oskar Hallatschek
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2011-09-06       Impact factor: 4.562

Review 6.  Experimental evolution in biofilm populations.

Authors:  Hans P Steenackers; Ilse Parijs; Akanksha Dubey; Kevin R Foster; Jozef Vanderleyden
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-02-18       Impact factor: 16.408

7.  Trade-Offs of Escherichia coli Adaptation to an Intracellular Lifestyle in Macrophages.

Authors:  M Azevedo; A Sousa; J Moura de Sousa; J A Thompson; J T Proença; I Gordo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-11       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Compost spatial heterogeneity promotes evolutionary diversification of a bacterium.

Authors:  Stineke van Houte; Daniel Padfield; Pedro Gómez; Adela M Luján; Michael A Brockhurst; Steve Paterson; Angus Buckling
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2020-11-18       Impact factor: 2.411

9.  The impact of spatial structure on viral genomic diversity generated during adaptation to thermal stress.

Authors:  Dilara Ally; Valorie R Wiss; Gail E Deckert; Danielle Green; Pavitra Roychoudhury; Holly A Wichman; Celeste J Brown; Stephen M Krone
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Bacteriophages affect evolution of bacterial communities in spatially distributed habitats: a simulation study.

Authors:  Alexandra Igorevna Klimenko; Yury Georgievich Matushkin; Nikolay Alexandrovich Kolchanov; Sergey Alexandrovich Lashin
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 3.605

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.