Literature DB >> 18028946

Impact of DNA hairpin folding energetics on antibody-ssDNA association.

Zhonghui Ou1, Christopher A Bottoms, Michael T Henzl, John J Tanner.   

Abstract

Deposition of anti-DNA antibodies in the kidney contributes to the pathogenesis of the autoimmune disease, systemic lupus erythematosus. Antibodies that bind to hairpin-forming DNA ligands may be particularly prone to deposition. Here we report the first structure of a Fab complexed with hairpin-forming DNA. The ligand used for co-crystallization is 5'-d [CTG(CCTT)CAG]-3', which has a predicted hairpin structure consisting of a four-nucleotide loop (CCTT) and a stem of three base-pairs. The 1.95 A resolution crystal structure of Fab DNA-1 complexed with this ligand shows that the conformation of the bound ligand differs radically from the predicted hairpin conformation. The three base-pairs in the stem are absent in the bound form. The protein binds to the last six nucleotides at the 3' end of the ligand. These nucleotides form a loop (TTCA) closed by a G:C base-pair in the bound state. Stacking of aromatic side-chains against DNA bases is the dominant interaction in the complex. Interactions with the DNA backbone are conspicuously absent. Thermodynamics of binding are examined using isothermal titration calorimetry. The apparent dissociation constant is 4 microM, and binding is enthalpically favorable and entropically unfavorable. Increasing the number of base-pairs in the DNA stem from three to six decreases binding affinity. These data suggest a conformational selection binding mechanism in which the Fab binds preferentially to the unstructured state of the ligand. In this interpretation, the ligand binding and ligand folding equilibria are coupled, with lower hairpin stability leading to greater effective binding affinity. Thus, pre-organization of the DNA loop into the preferred binding conformation does not play a major role in complexation. Rather, it is argued that the stem of the hairpin serves to reduce the degrees of freedom in the free DNA ligand, thereby limiting the entropic cost attendant to complexation with the Fab.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18028946      PMCID: PMC2516951          DOI: 10.1016/j.jmb.2007.09.084

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  43 in total

1.  The Protein Data Bank.

Authors:  H M Berman; J Westbrook; Z Feng; G Gilliland; T N Bhat; H Weissig; I N Shindyalov; P E Bourne
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2000-01-01       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 2.  Anti-DNA antibodies: aspects of structure and pathogenicity.

Authors:  Y J Jang; B D Stollar
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 9.261

3.  Recent developments in the PHENIX software for automated crystallographic structure determination.

Authors:  Paul D Adams; Kreshna Gopal; Ralf W Grosse-Kunstleve; Li-Wei Hung; Thomas R Ioerger; Airlie J McCoy; Nigel W Moriarty; Reetal K Pai; Randy J Read; Tod D Romo; James C Sacchettini; Nicholas K Sauter; Laurent C Storoni; Thomas C Terwilliger
Journal:  J Synchrotron Radiat       Date:  2003-11-28       Impact factor: 2.616

Review 4.  The role of nucleosomes in lupus.

Authors:  Z Amoura; S Koutouzov; J C Piette
Journal:  Curr Opin Rheumatol       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.006

5.  Isolation and characterization of nucleic acid-binding antibody fragments from autoimmune mice-derived bacteriophage display libraries.

Authors:  M J Calcutt; M T Kremer; M F Giblin; T P Quinn; S L Deutscher
Journal:  Gene       Date:  1993-12-27       Impact factor: 3.688

6.  Solvent content of protein crystals.

Authors:  B W Matthews
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1968-04-28       Impact factor: 5.469

Review 7.  Anti-DNA autoantibodies and systemic lupus erythematosus.

Authors:  N B Blatt; G D Glick
Journal:  Pharmacol Ther       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 12.310

8.  Spectroscopic, calorimetric, and kinetic demonstration of conformational adaptation in peptide-antibody recognition.

Authors:  L Leder; C Berger; S Bornhauser; H Wendt; F Ackermann; I Jelesarov; H R Bosshard
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  1995-12-19       Impact factor: 3.162

9.  Mutational analysis of a sequence-specific ssDNA binding lupus autoantibody.

Authors:  Joanne Cleary; Gary D Glick
Journal:  Biochemistry       Date:  2003-01-14       Impact factor: 3.162

Review 10.  Structure-function correlates of autoantibodies to nucleic acids. Lessons from immunochemical, genetic and structural studies.

Authors:  D Eilat; W F Anderson
Journal:  Mol Immunol       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 4.407

View more
  2 in total

1.  The Combining Sites of Anti-lipid A Antibodies Reveal a Widely Utilized Motif Specific for Negatively Charged Groups.

Authors:  Omid Haji-Ghassemi; Sven Müller-Loennies; Teresa Rodriguez; Lore Brade; Hans-Dieter Grimmecke; Helmut Brade; Stephen V Evans
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Predicting residues involved in anti-DNA autoantibodies with limited neural networks.

Authors:  Rachel St Clair; Michael Teti; Mirjana Pavlovic; William Hahn; Elan Barenholtz
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.079

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.