Literature DB >> 18028916

Ultraflex precision colonic stent placement as a bridge to surgery in patients with malignant colon obstruction.

Diego Fregonese1, Riccardo Naspetti, Salvador Ferrer, Juan Gallego, Guido Costamagna, Remi Dumas, Marcello Campaioli, Alfredo Lopez Morante, Pierre Mambrini, Søren Meisner, Alessandro Repici, Luis Andreo, Enzo Masci, Alberto Mingo, Javier Barcenilla, Lucio Petruzziello.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Emergency surgery for malignant colon obstruction entails relatively high morbidity and mortality rates and typically necessitates a 2-step resection. These problems might be potentially mitigated by placement of a self-expanding metal stent (SEMS) as a bridge to surgery. A nitinol colorectal SEMS may offer several advantages, but available evidence on the utility of this SEMS type remains highly limited.
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety as a bridge to surgery of a nitinol SEMS designed for colorectal use.
DESIGN: Prospective and retrospective multicenter clinical study.
SETTING: Sixteen European study centers. PATIENTS: Thirty-six patients with malignant colonic obstruction.
INTERVENTIONS: Nitinol colorectal SEMS placement. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Technical success in accurate SEMS placement with coverage of the entire stricture length, clinical success in alleviating colonic obstructive symptoms, and bridging to elective surgery.
RESULTS: Technical success was achieved in 97% of patients with a 95% CI of 85% to 100% and clinical success in 81% (95% CI, 64%-92%). Elective surgery was performed in 94% (95% CI, 81%-99%) of patients at a median of 11 days (95% CI, 7-15 days) after SEMS placement. SEMS-related perforation occurred in 3 patients. LIMITATIONS: No control group was included in this nonrandomized cohort study.
CONCLUSIONS: In this first comparatively large clinical study of a nitinol colorectal SEMS as a bridge to surgery, a high proportion of patients successfully proceeded to elective surgery after prior decompression by SEMS placement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18028916     DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.05.022

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  15 in total

1.  Duodenal and colonic stent placement with 0.025″ and 0.035″ guidewires is equally safe and effective.

Authors:  Jessica Chan; Kristen Hilden; John Fang; Douglas G Adler
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2011-10-08       Impact factor: 3.199

Review 2.  Stents for colorectal obstruction: Past, present, and future.

Authors:  Eui Joo Kim; Yoon Jae Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-01-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Self-expandable metallic stents in patients with stage IV obstructing colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Antonietta Lamazza; Enrico Fiori; Alberto Schillaci; Ercole DeMasi; Stefano Pontone; Antonio V Sterpetti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  A prospective evaluation of short-term and long-term results from colonic stenting for palliation or as a bridge to elective operation versus immediate surgery for large-bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Luca Gianotti; Nicolò Tamini; Luca Nespoli; Matteo Rota; Elisa Bolzonaro; Roberto Frego; Alessandro Redaelli; Laura Antolini; Antonella Ardito; Angelo Nespoli; Marco Dinelli
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A temporary self-expanding metallic stent for malignant colorectal obstruction.

Authors:  Xiao-Li Ding; Yong-Dong Li; Rui-Min Yang; Fen-Bao Li; Ming-Qiu Zhang
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Long-term success of colonic stent insertion is influenced by indication but not by length of stent or site of obstruction.

Authors:  Christian P Selinger; Jayapal Ramesh; Derrick F Martin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2011-01-05       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  A new technique for placement of a self-expanding metallic stent (SEMS) in patients with colon rectal obstruction: a prospective study of 43 patients.

Authors:  Antonietta Lamazza; Enrico Fiori; Alberto Schillaci; Antonio V Sterpetti
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Colonic stenting: a practical update.

Authors:  Sanchoy Sarkar; Joe Geraghty; Paul Rooney
Journal:  Frontline Gastroenterol       Date:  2013-03-12

9.  Predictors of outcome for endoscopic colorectal stenting: a decade experience.

Authors:  Maher A Abbas; Greg Kharabadze; Ethan M Ross; Mohammad A Abbass
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2016-11-05       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 10.  Update on the indications and use of colonic stents.

Authors:  Eduardo A Bonin; Todd H Baron
Journal:  Curr Gastroenterol Rep       Date:  2010-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.