Literature DB >> 18028587

Response and remission rates in Chinese patients with bipolar mania treated for 4 weeks with either quetiapine or lithium: a randomized and double-blind study.

Huafang Li1, Cui Ma, Gang Wang, Xiaotong Zhu, Mengye Peng, Niufan Gu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and tolerability of quetiapine in Chinese patients hospitalized with acute bipolar mania.
METHODS: This was a 4-week, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, lithium-controlled, parallel-group study. Secondary endpoints in the primary analysis were: response rate (> or = 50% decrease from baseline in YMRS total score) and remission rate as defined using 3 criteria: YMRS total score < or = 12, YMRS total score < or = 12 + MADRS total score < or = 8, and YMRS total score < or = 8. Other measures included: change from baseline at Day 28 in YMRS, PANSS, and MADRS total score. Adverse event (AE) data were collected throughout the study.
RESULTS: 73 (94.8%) quetiapine and 62 (80.5%) lithium patients completed the study. Mean (SD) quetiapine doses for the ITT population and responders were 648.2 (111.84)mg/day and 637.5 (118.78)mg/day, respectively, while mean lithium concentrations for the ITT population and responders were 0.80 (0.28)mmol/L and 0.80 (0.22)mmol/L, respectively. Of patients who responded to quetiapine at Day 28, 88.3% were receiving 600-800mg/day. At Day 28 YMRS response rate was significantly greater with quetiapine than lithium (77.9% vs. 59.7%, p = 0.0132), and remission rates using the 3 criteria were significantly greater with quetiapine than lithium: YMRS total score < or = 12 (70.1% vs. 48.1%, p = 0.0071), YMRS < or = 12 + MADRS < or = 8 (70.1% vs. 48.1%; p = 0.0071), and YMRS < or = 8 (51.9% vs. 32.5%; p = 0.0147). Significant decreases were observed in PANSS, YMRS, and MADRS total scores for both groups. The most common AEs experienced by patients receiving quetiapine were constipation, dizziness, diarrhea, alanine aminotransferase increase, palpitations, aspartate aminotransferase increase, pharyngolaryngeal pain, upper respiratory tract infection and dry mouth. In patients receiving lithium, the most common AEs were nausea (16.9%), constipation (13.0%), vomiting (13.0%), nasopharyngitis (11.7%), dizziness (6.5%), diarrhea (6.5%), and upper respiratory tract infection (6.5%).
CONCLUSION: Quetiapine was shown to be clinically effective in patients with acute bipolar mania. There were side effects with quetiapine similar to those reported in other studies that included other ethnic populations of patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18028587     DOI: 10.1185/030079908x253933

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Med Res Opin        ISSN: 0300-7995            Impact factor:   2.580


  10 in total

Review 1.  The International College of Neuro-Psychopharmacology (CINP) Treatment Guidelines for Bipolar Disorder in Adults (CINP-BD-2017), Part 2: Review, Grading of the Evidence, and a Precise Algorithm.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Lakshmi Yatham; Heinz Grunze; Eduard Vieta; Allan Young; Pierre Blier; Siegfried Kasper; Hans Jurgen Moeller
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 5.176

2.  Lithium for acute mania.

Authors:  Rebecca F McKnight; Saïk J G N de La Motte de Broöns de Vauvert; Edward Chesney; Ben H Amit; John Geddes; Andrea Cipriani
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-06-01

Review 3.  Efficacy of pharmacotherapy in bipolar disorder: a report by the WPA section on pharmacopsychiatry.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Siegfried Kasper; Ole Andreassen; Pierre Blier; Ahmed Okasha; Emanuel Severus; Marcio Versiani; Rajiv Tandon; Hans-Jürgen Möller; Eduard Vieta
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 4.  Efficacy of antimanic treatments: meta-analysis of randomized, controlled trials.

Authors:  Ayşegül Yildiz; Eduard Vieta; Stefan Leucht; Ross J Baldessarini
Journal:  Neuropsychopharmacology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 7.853

Review 5.  Level of response and safety of pharmacological monotherapy in the treatment of acute bipolar I disorder phases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jorge M Tamayo; Carlos A Zarate; Eduard Vieta; Gustavo Vázquez; Mauricio Tohen
Journal:  Int J Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 5.176

Review 6.  Lithium treatment of Bipolar disorder in adults: A systematic review of randomized trials and meta-analyses.

Authors:  Konstantinos N Fountoulakis; Mauricio Tohen; Carlos A Zarate
Journal:  Eur Neuropsychopharmacol       Date:  2022-01       Impact factor: 4.600

7.  A Randomized, Double-Blind, Controlled Trial of Lithium Versus Quetiapine for the Treatment of Acute Mania in Youth with Early Course Bipolar Disorder.

Authors:  Luis R Patino; Christina C Klein; Jeffrey R Strawn; Thomas J Blom; Maxwell J Tallman; Caleb M Adler; Jeffrey A Welge; Melissa P DelBello
Journal:  J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol       Date:  2021-09-14       Impact factor: 3.031

Review 8.  Pharmacological treatment of adult bipolar disorder.

Authors:  Ross J Baldessarini; Leonardo Tondo; Gustavo H Vázquez
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  The ARIQUELI study: potentiation of quetiapine in bipolar I nonresponders with lithium versus aripiprazole.

Authors:  Giovani Missio; Doris Hupfeld Moreno; Fernando Fernandes; Danielle Soares Bio; Márcio Gehardt Soeiro-de-Souza; Domingos Rodrigues dos Santos; Denise Petresco David; Luis Felipe Costa; Frederico Navas Demétrio; Ricardo Alberto Moreno
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2013-06-27       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  An Oldie but Goodie: Lithium in the Treatment of Bipolar Disorder through Neuroprotective and Neurotrophic Mechanisms.

Authors:  Eunsoo Won; Yong-Ku Kim
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-12-11       Impact factor: 5.923

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.