Literature DB >> 18027818

Human sex ratios and sex distribution in sibships of size 2.

William D Stansfield1, Matthew A Carlton.   

Abstract

We previously analyzed data from the U.S. National Health Interview Survey (NHIS, 1998 to 2002) on families with two biological children (10 years of age and younger) and found that the distribution of families with two boys, two girls, and one boy + one girl did not statistically conform to a binomial distribution regardless of the boy/girl sex ratio used. Using the best estimate of the sex ratio from the data, we found that there were significantly more families with opposite-sex siblings than families with same-sex siblings. No biological mechanism could explain these results at the time. In the present study we conducted an analysis of the first two children in sibships of size 3 from the same data source and found that there are significantly more same-sex sibships than unlike-sex sibships. Combining the two sets of data for the first two children produced observed numbers in close agreement with the expected numbers. A hypothesis of parental choice (family planning) appears to be strongly supported as an explanation for the discrepancies in the two sets of data individually. For example, parents who have a boy and a girl (either order) as their first two children are more likely to stop having children ("stopping rule") than are parents whose first two children are of the same sex.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18027818     DOI: 10.1353/hub.2007.0035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Biol        ISSN: 0018-7143            Impact factor:   0.553


  1 in total

1.  Genome-wide meta-analysis of common variant differences between men and women.

Authors:  Vesna Boraska; Ana Jerončić; Vincenza Colonna; Lorraine Southam; Dale R Nyholt; Nigel William Rayner; John R B Perry; Daniela Toniolo; Eva Albrecht; Wei Ang; Stefania Bandinelli; Maja Barbalic; Inês Barroso; Jacques S Beckmann; Reiner Biffar; Dorret Boomsma; Harry Campbell; Tanguy Corre; Jeanette Erdmann; Tõnu Esko; Krista Fischer; Nora Franceschini; Timothy M Frayling; Giorgia Girotto; Juan R Gonzalez; Tamara B Harris; Andrew C Heath; Iris M Heid; Wolfgang Hoffmann; Albert Hofman; Momoko Horikoshi; Jing Hua Zhao; Anne U Jackson; Jouke-Jan Hottenga; Antti Jula; Mika Kähönen; Kay-Tee Khaw; Lambertus A Kiemeney; Norman Klopp; Zoltán Kutalik; Vasiliki Lagou; Lenore J Launer; Terho Lehtimäki; Mathieu Lemire; Marja-Liisa Lokki; Christina Loley; Jian'an Luan; Massimo Mangino; Irene Mateo Leach; Sarah E Medland; Evelin Mihailov; Grant W Montgomery; Gerjan Navis; John Newnham; Markku S Nieminen; Aarno Palotie; Kalliope Panoutsopoulou; Annette Peters; Nicola Pirastu; Ozren Polasek; Karola Rehnström; Samuli Ripatti; Graham R S Ritchie; Fernando Rivadeneira; Antonietta Robino; Nilesh J Samani; So-Youn Shin; Juha Sinisalo; Johannes H Smit; Nicole Soranzo; Lisette Stolk; Dorine W Swinkels; Toshiko Tanaka; Alexander Teumer; Anke Tönjes; Michela Traglia; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Armand Valsesia; Wiek H van Gilst; Joyce B J van Meurs; Albert Vernon Smith; Jorma Viikari; Jacqueline M Vink; Gerard Waeber; Nicole M Warrington; Elisabeth Widen; Gonneke Willemsen; Alan F Wright; Brent W Zanke; Lina Zgaga; Michael Boehnke; Adamo Pio d'Adamo; Eco de Geus; Ellen W Demerath; Martin den Heijer; Johan G Eriksson; Luigi Ferrucci; Christian Gieger; Vilmundur Gudnason; Caroline Hayward; Christian Hengstenberg; Thomas J Hudson; Marjo-Riitta Järvelin; Manolis Kogevinas; Ruth J F Loos; Nicholas G Martin; Andres Metspalu; Craig E Pennell; Brenda W Penninx; Markus Perola; Olli Raitakari; Veikko Salomaa; Stefan Schreiber; Heribert Schunkert; Tim D Spector; Michael Stumvoll; André G Uitterlinden; Sheila Ulivi; Pim van der Harst; Peter Vollenweider; Henry Völzke; Nicholas J Wareham; H-Erich Wichmann; James F Wilson; Igor Rudan; Yali Xue; Eleftheria Zeggini
Journal:  Hum Mol Genet       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 6.150

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.