Literature DB >> 18027311

Optimal endotracheal tube tip position in extremely premature infants.

Sudhin Thayyil1, Prasad Nagakumar, Helen Gowers, Ajay Sinha.   

Abstract

Although right main bronchus intubation is associated with adverse consequences, the optimal endotracheal tube (ETT) tip position above the carina in neonates is not known. The aim of this study was to determine the association between ETT tip position and adverse pulmonary effects as assessed by chest radiographs (CXRs). Lung aeration was examined after masking ETT positions in the first two CXRs taken after birth in 74 consecutive ventilated premature infants <or= 28 weeks. All the CXRs of the infants during the first week were examined for predefined combined adverse pulmonary outcomes by two examiners (right upper lobe collapse, localized pulmonary interstitial emphysema [PIE], and pneumothorax). Infants who had ETT tips below T4 or in the right main bronchus were excluded. The ETT tip was above T1 in 4 (5.4%), at T1 in 11 (14.8%), at T2 in 19 (25.6%), at T3 in 27 (36.5%), and at T4 in 13 (17.6%) infants. The patients were categorized into group A (ETT tips at T1/2) or group B (ETT above T1 or below T2). The combined adverse pulmonary outcome of pneumothorax, localized PIE, and right upper lobe collapse was significantly higher in group B compared with group A ( P=0.03). On logistic regression analysis, the only independent association for adverse pulmonary outcome and asymmetrical lung aeration was the ETT position. The odds ratio for developing nonuniform lung aeration was 6 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.8, 20) and for adverse pulmonary outcome was 8 (95% CI 1.1, 73) when the ETT tip was at T3/T4 compared with T1/2. We concluded that the ETT tip should be kept at the level of the first or second thoracic vertebrae in extremely premature babies to reduce the incidence of nonuniform lung aeration and adverse pulmonary outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18027311     DOI: 10.1055/s-2007-995221

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Perinatol        ISSN: 0735-1631            Impact factor:   1.862


  7 in total

1.  Accuracy of the nasal-tragus length measurement for correct endotracheal tube placement in a cohort of neonatal resuscitation simulators.

Authors:  M M Gray; H Delaney; R Umoren; T P Strandjord; T Sawyer
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 2.521

2.  Weight Is More Accurate than Gestational Age When Estimating the Optimal Endotracheal Tube Depth in Neonates.

Authors:  Hsien-Kuan Liu; Yung-Ning Yang; Shu-Leei Tey; Pei-Ling Wu; San-Nan Yang; Chien-Yi Wu
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-22

3.  Refractory Pulmonary Interstitial Emphysema in Extreme Premature Newborn.

Authors:  Mahmoud Ali; Lea Mallett; Greg Miller
Journal:  AJP Rep       Date:  2021-05-27

4.  Tracheal Length Measurement in Intubated Neonates to Guide the Design and Use of Endotracheal Tube Glottic Depth Markings.

Authors:  Jennifer B Cerone; Joaquim M B Pinheiro
Journal:  Children (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-29

5.  Recommendations for nasotracheal tube insertion depths in neonates.

Authors:  Chinedu Ulrich Ebenebe; Kristina Schriever; Monika Wolf; Jochen Herrmann; Dominique Singer; Philipp Deindl
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2022-08-22       Impact factor: 3.569

6.  Chest X-ray: an examination that has been in use for centuries but is still essential, especially in the clinical management of newborns in the neonatal intensive care unit.

Authors:  Sara Reis Teixeira; Aline Naves
Journal:  Radiol Bras       Date:  2018 Jan-Feb

7.  Randomised trial estimating length of endotracheal tube insertion using gestational age or nasal-tragus length in newborns: a study protocol.

Authors:  Abdul Razak; Maheer Faden; Jameel Alghamdi; Abdulaziz Binmanee; Abdullah Hawash Alonazi; Anas Hamdoun; Saud Almugaiteeb; Waseemoddin Patel; Hamdi Katar; Fabian Lora; Abdullah Alismail; Adrian Lavery; Ibrahim Hamama; Noura Alsaleem; Manal Alshaikh; Lama Alrasheed; Omar Aldibasi
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-01-19       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.