Literature DB >> 18027165

Synthetic vitreous fibers: a review toxicology, epidemiology and regulations.

David M Bernstein1.   

Abstract

This review addresses the characteristics which differentiate synthetic vitreous fibers (SVFs, e.g., fiber glass, stonewool, slagwool, refractory ceramic fibers, etc.), how these influence the potential biopersistence and toxicity, the most recent epidemiological results and the integration of these findings into the health and safety regulations in Europe and the United States. Also presented is the historical basis for the European classification directive. The use and equivalence of the chronic inhalation toxicology and chronic intraperitoneal injection studies in laboratory rodents for evaluation of fiber toxicology is assessed as well as the impact of dose selection and design on the validity of the study. While synthetic vitreous fibers can span a wide range of chemistries, recognition and understanding of the importance of biopersistence (ability to persist in the lung) in fiber toxicity has led to the development of more and more biosoluble fibers (that break down rapidly in the lung). Still, the epidemiological data available which are largely based upon the use of fibers in past decades, indicate that the SVF do not present a human health risk at current exposure levels. The animal toxicology and biopersistence data provide a coherent basis for understanding and evaluating the parameters which affect SVF toxicity. The current regulations are based upon an extensive knowledge base of chronic studies in laboratory rodents which confirm the relationship between chronic adverse effects and the biopersistence of the longer fibers that can not be fully phagocytised and efficiently cleared from the lung. The amorphous structure of synthetic vitreous fibers facilitates designing fibers in use today with low biopersistence. Both the epidemiological data and the animal studies database provide strong assurance that there is little if any health risk associated with the use of SVFs of low biopersistence. IARC (2001) reclassified these fibers from Category 2b to Category 3 (with RCF and special purpose fibers remaining in 2b) an event which has not been common in the history of these monographs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18027165     DOI: 10.1080/10408440701524592

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol        ISSN: 1040-8444            Impact factor:   5.635


  9 in total

Review 1.  Pulmonary endpoints (lung carcinomas and asbestosis) following inhalation exposure to asbestos.

Authors:  Brooke T Mossman; Morton Lippmann; Thomas W Hesterberg; Karl T Kelsey; Aaron Barchowsky; James C Bonner
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

2.  Case report: analytical electron microscopy of lung granulomas associated with exposure to coating materials carried by glass wool fibers.

Authors:  Angela S Ferreira; Valéria B Moreira; Marcos César S Castro; Porfírio J Soares; Eduardo Algranti; Leonardo R Andrade
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 9.031

Review 3.  Health risk of chrysotile revisited.

Authors:  David Bernstein; Jacques Dunnigan; Thomas Hesterberg; Robert Brown; Juan Antonio Legaspi Velasco; Raúl Barrera; John Hoskins; Allen Gibbs
Journal:  Crit Rev Toxicol       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 5.635

Review 4.  Non-neoplastic and neoplastic pleural endpoints following fiber exposure.

Authors:  V Courtney Broaddus; Jeffrey I Everitt; Brad Black; Agnes B Kane
Journal:  J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 6.393

5.  Do insulation products of man-made vitreous fibres still cause skin discomfort?

Authors:  Lennart Lundgren; Cecilia Moberg; Carola Lidén
Journal:  Contact Dermatitis       Date:  2014-03-31       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 6.  Perspectives on refractory ceramic fiber (RCF) carcinogenicity: comparisons with other fibers.

Authors:  Helmut Greim; Mark J Utell; L Daniel Maxim; Ron Niebo
Journal:  Inhal Toxicol       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 2.724

Review 7.  A critical review of the current knowledge regarding the biological impact of nanocellulose.

Authors:  C Endes; S Camarero-Espinosa; S Mueller; E J Foster; A Petri-Fink; B Rothen-Rutishauser; C Weder; M J D Clift
Journal:  J Nanobiotechnology       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 10.435

8.  Biomarkers for Pulmonary Inflammation and Fibrosis and Lung Ventilation Function in Chinese Occupational Refractory Ceramic Fibers-Exposed Workers.

Authors:  Xiaojun Zhu; Yishuo Gu; Wenjun Ma; Panjun Gao; Mengxuan Liu; Pei Xiao; Hongfei Wang; Juan Chen; Tao Li
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.390

Review 9.  History of breast implants: Back to the future.

Authors:  Fabio Santanelli di Pompeo; Guido Paolini; Guido Firmani; Michail Sorotos
Journal:  JPRAS Open       Date:  2022-03-11
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.