Literature DB >> 18027152

The role of the CTLA4 blockade in the treatment of malignant melanoma.

Lee D Cranmer1, Evan Hersh.   

Abstract

Metastatic melanoma remains a disease with few effective treatments. The anti-tumor immune response has long been felt to be important in the prognosis of melanoma, and much work has focused on harnessing the immune system to fight this disease. Tumor-specific vaccines, immunomodulatory cytokines and non-specific immunostimulants (such as Bacille Calmette Guerin/BCG) have all been investigated. A new strategy has been identified involving cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen-4 (CTLA4). This molecule is expressed on the surface of activated T-lymphocytes and exerts a suppressive effect on the induction of immune responses after interaction between T-cell receptor (TCR) and human lymphocyte antigen (HLA) molecules on the antigen-presenting cell (APC). Work in animal models demonstrated that antibody-mediated blockade of this target could lead to anti-tumor responses. Two fully human monoclonal antibodies, ipilimumab (MDX-010) and tremelimumab (CP-675, 206; formerly known as ticilimumab), are in clinical development. Both have demonstrated hints of clinical activity in metastatic melanoma. Both also have a toxicity profile consistent with their mechanism of action, involving inactivation of a normal immunosuppressive homeostatic mechanism: development of auto-immune breakthrough events (IBE). These include inflammatory bowel disease (IBD), uveitis, dermatitis, arthritis, and others. Generally, these events have been easily managed by cessation of therapy and intravenous or topical steroid therapy and supportive care in most patients, although colectomy had been required in several severe cases and there have been several deaths. Interestingly, patients who develop IBE seem to have the greatest likelihood of clinical benefit, but it is unclear whether clinical benefit and IBE are dissociable events. Other than IBE, no other pharmacodynamic measure has been able to predict response, although certain autoimmune antibody titers may have promise in this regard. Further research will confirm the clinical benefit of these agents alone and in combination with other agents, further define the safety profile and protocols for toxicity management, and identify pharmacodynamic parameters predicting clinical benefit and toxicity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18027152     DOI: 10.1080/07357900701522315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer Invest        ISSN: 0735-7907            Impact factor:   2.176


  10 in total

Review 1.  Safety and immunotoxicity assessment of immunomodulatory monoclonal antibodies.

Authors:  Frank R Brennan; Laura Dill Morton; Sebastian Spindeldreher; Andrea Kiessling; Roy Allenspach; Adam Hey; Patrick Y Muller; Werner Frings; Jennifer Sims
Journal:  MAbs       Date:  2010-05-23       Impact factor: 5.857

2.  Enhancement of anti-tumor immunity through local modulation of CTLA-4 and GITR by dendritic cells.

Authors:  Scott K Pruitt; David Boczkowski; Nicole de Rosa; N Rebecca Haley; Michael A Morse; Douglas S Tyler; Jens Dannull; Smita Nair
Journal:  Eur J Immunol       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 5.532

Review 3.  Targeted immunotherapy trials for idiopathic inflammatory myopathies.

Authors:  Joerg-Patrick Stübgen
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2012-06-30       Impact factor: 4.849

Review 4.  Combating immunosuppression in glioma.

Authors:  Eleanor A Vega; Michael W Graner; John H Sampson
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 3.404

5.  CTLA4 blockade with ipilimumab to treat relapse of malignancy after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation.

Authors:  Asad Bashey; Bridget Medina; Sue Corringham; Mildred Pasek; Ewa Carrier; Linda Vrooman; Israel Lowy; Scott R Solomon; Lawrence E Morris; H Kent Holland; James R Mason; Edwin P Alyea; Robert J Soiffer; Edward D Ball
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 22.113

6.  Genetically engineered Newcastle disease virus for malignant melanoma therapy.

Authors:  D Zamarin; A Vigil; K Kelly; A García-Sastre; Y Fong
Journal:  Gene Ther       Date:  2009-02-26       Impact factor: 5.250

Review 7.  Immunotherapy of distant metastatic disease.

Authors:  D Schadendorf; S M Algarra; L Bastholt; G Cinat; B Dreno; A M M Eggermont; E Espinosa; J Guo; A Hauschild; T Petrella; J Schachter; P Hersey
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  Ipilimumab pharmacotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma.

Authors:  Joanne M Jeter; Lee D Cranmer; Evan M Hersh
Journal:  Clin Med Insights Oncol       Date:  2012-07-30

9.  A phase II multicenter study of ipilimumab with or without dacarbazine in chemotherapy-naïve patients with advanced melanoma.

Authors:  Evan M Hersh; Steven J O'Day; John Powderly; Khuda D Khan; Anna C Pavlick; Lee D Cranmer; Wolfram E Samlowski; Geoffrey M Nichol; Michael J Yellin; Jeffrey S Weber
Journal:  Invest New Drugs       Date:  2010-01-16       Impact factor: 3.651

Review 10.  T-regulatory cell modulation: the future of cancer immunotherapy?

Authors:  S Nizar; J Copier; B Meyer; M Bodman-Smith; C Galustian; D Kumar; A Dalgleish
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2009-04-21       Impact factor: 7.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.