Literature DB >> 18026864

Changes in physical fitness in moderately fit adults with and without the use of exercise telemetry monitors.

Susanne Ring-Dimitriou1, Serge P von Duvillard, Monika Stadlmann, Hannu Kinnunen, Oliver Drachta, Erich Müller, Raija Laukkanen, Jena Hamra, Sandy Weeks, Kayla Peak.   

Abstract

One of the goals of exercise prescription is the use of easily understandable physical activities to improve physical fitness. Lack of study designs investigating self-administered programs utilizing exercise telemetry monitors (ETM) compared to a no exercise telemetry monitors (NETM) guided exercise programs exist. The aim of the study was to determine whether the ETM programs improve physical fitness more than NETM programs and to measure differences between males and females. Fifty-one adults were randomly divided into either the ETM group (n = 34, age = 37.9 +/- 5.0 years, BMI = 24.6 +/- 3.0, VO(2) = 37.9 +/- 7.7 ml kg(-1) min(-1)) or the NETM group (n = 27, age = 39.6 +/- 5.5 years, BMI = 24.5 +/- 4.2, VO(2) = 40.8 +/- 6.5 ml kg(-1) min(-1)). All subjects completed a maximal incremental treadmill test to determine their submaximal and maximal running performance, oxygen uptake (VO(2)peak, VO(2-AT), VO(2-70%), km h(-1) peak, km h(-1) (AT), km h(-1) (70%)) before and after 10 weeks of an unsupervised exercise program. All exercise sessions for ETM and NETM groups were individually recorded and analyzed. Multivariate analysis of variance revealed that running performance at anaerobic threshold increased significantly in ETM vs. NETM groups (P <or= 0.03). Males in the ETM group improved significantly in all variables of VO(2), and in km h(-1) (AT) after 10 week. No significant differences in VO(2) were found for female groups. Based on the exercise records, women in the NETM group completed significantly more sessions (P <or= 0.03), specifically more moderately intense sessions (P <or= 0.02), compared to the ETM-female group. Males did not differ in total exercise sessions; however, ETM-men completed significantly more light sessions (P <or= 0.01) compared to men in NETM. Running was the activity of choice. After 10 weeks of telemetry monitor prescribed exercise program, only men, but not women, improved in physical fitness.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18026864     DOI: 10.1007/s00421-007-0615-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol        ISSN: 1439-6319            Impact factor:   3.078


  23 in total

Review 1.  Is physical activity or physical fitness more important in defining health benefits?

Authors:  S N Blair; Y Cheng; J S Holder
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  The effect of interdian and diurnal variation on oxygen uptake kinetics during treadmill running.

Authors:  Helen Carter; Andrew M Jones; Neil S Maxwell; Jonathan H Doust
Journal:  J Sports Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 3.337

3.  Physical activity levels and body weight in a nationally representative sample in the European Union.

Authors:  M D Vaz de Almeida; P Graça; C Afonso; A D'Amicis; R Lappalainen; S Damkjaer
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 4.022

Review 4.  Aerobic fitness norms for males and females aged 6 to 75 years: a review.

Authors:  E Shvartz; R C Reibold
Journal:  Aviat Space Environ Med       Date:  1990-01

5.  Is physical activity or aerobic power more influential on reducing cardiovascular disease risk factors?

Authors:  R G McMurray; B E Ainsworth; J S Harrell; T R Griggs; O D Williams
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Relationship of changes in maximal and submaximal aerobic fitness to changes in cardiovascular disease and non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus risk factors with endurance training: the HERITAGE Family Study.

Authors:  J H Wilmore; J S Green; P R Stanforth; J Gagnon; T Rankinen; A S Leon; D C Rao; J S Skinner; C Bouchard
Journal:  Metabolism       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 8.694

7.  Age, sex, race, initial fitness, and response to training: the HERITAGE Family Study.

Authors:  J S Skinner; A Jaskólski; A Jaskólska; J Krasnoff; J Gagnon; A S Leon; D C Rao; J H Wilmore; C Bouchard
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-05

8.  Reduction in cardiovascular disease risk factors: 6-month results from Project Active.

Authors:  A L Dunn; B H Marcus; J B Kampert; M E Garcia; H W Kohl; S N Blair
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.018

Review 9.  Dose response between total volume of physical activity and health and fitness.

Authors:  P Oja
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  A meta-analysis of periodized versus nonperiodized strength and power training programs.

Authors:  Matthew R Rhea; Brandon L Alderman
Journal:  Res Q Exerc Sport       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.