Literature DB >> 18025594

Effects of substrate loading on enzymatic hydrolysis and viscosity of pretreated barley straw.

Lisa Rosgaard1, Pavle Andric, Kim Dam-Johansen, Sven Pedersen, Anne S Meyer.   

Abstract

In this study, the applicability of a "fed-batch" strategy, that is, sequential loading of substrate or substrate plus enzymes during enzymatic hydrolysis was evaluated for hydrolysis of steam-pretreated barley straw. The specific aims were to achieve hydrolysis of high substrate levels, low viscosity during hydrolysis, and high glucose concentrations. An enzyme system comprising Celluclast and Novozyme 188, a commercial cellulase product derived from Trichoderma reesei and a beta-glucosidase derived from Aspergillus niger, respectively, was used for the enzymatic hydrolysis. The highest final glucose concentration, 78 g/l, after 72 h of reaction, was obtained with an initial, full substrate loading of 15% dry matter weight/weight (w/w DM). Conversely, the glucose yields, in grams per gram of DM, were highest at lower substrate concentrations, with the highest glucose yield being 0.53 g/g DM for the reaction with a substrate loading of 5% w/w DM after 72 h. The reactions subjected to gradual loading of substrate or substrate plus enzymes to increase the substrate levels from 5 to 15% w/w DM, consistently provided lower concentrations of glucose after 72 h of reaction; however, the initial rates of conversion varied in the different reactions. Rapid cellulose degradation was accompanied by rapid decreases in viscosity before addition of extra substrate, but when extra substrate or substrate plus enzymes were added, the viscosities of the slurries increased and the hydrolytic efficiencies decreased temporarily.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18025594     DOI: 10.1007/s12010-007-0028-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Biochem Biotechnol        ISSN: 0273-2289            Impact factor:   2.926


  13 in total

1.  Efficient chemical and enzymatic saccharification of the lignocellulosic residue from Agave tequilana bagasse to produce ethanol by Pichia caribbica.

Authors:  Jaime Saucedo-Luna; Agustin Jaime Castro-Montoya; Mauro Manuel Martinez-Pacheco; Carlos Ruben Sosa-Aguirre; Jesus Campos-Garcia
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-11-12       Impact factor: 3.346

2.  Using an artificial neural network to predict the optimal conditions for enzymatic hydrolysis of apple pomace.

Authors:  Repson Gama; J Susan Van Dyk; Mike H Burton; Brett I Pletschke
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 2.406

3.  Adaptation of the xylose fermenting yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae F12 for improving ethanol production in different fed-batch SSF processes.

Authors:  E Tomás-Pejó; M Ballesteros; J M Oliva; L Olsson
Journal:  J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2010-06-29       Impact factor: 3.346

4.  Ethanol and anaerobic conditions reversibly inhibit commercial cellulase activity in thermophilic simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (tSSF).

Authors:  Kara K Podkaminer; William R Kenealy; Christopher D Herring; David A Hogsett; Lee R Lynd
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2012-06-15       Impact factor: 6.040

5.  Enzymatic lignocellulose hydrolysis: Improved cellulase productivity by insoluble solids recycling.

Authors:  Noah Weiss; Johan Börjesson; Lars Saaby Pedersen; Anne S Meyer
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-01-21       Impact factor: 6.040

6.  Yield-determining factors in high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulose.

Authors:  Jan B Kristensen; Claus Felby; Henning Jørgensen
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 6.040

7.  Fed-batch SSCF using steam-exploded wheat straw at high dry matter consistencies and a xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae strain: effect of laccase supplementation.

Authors:  Antonio D Moreno; Elia Tomás-Pejó; David Ibarra; Mercedes Ballesteros; Lisbeth Olsson
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 6.040

8.  Opuntia ficus-indica cladodes as feedstock for ethanol production by Kluyveromyces marxianus and Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Olukayode O Kuloyo; James C du Preez; Maria del Prado García-Aparicio; Stephanus G Kilian; Laurinda Steyn; Johann Görgens
Journal:  World J Microbiol Biotechnol       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 3.312

9.  Influence of fiber degradation and concentration of fermentable sugars on simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of high-solids spruce slurry to ethanol.

Authors:  Kerstin Hoyer; Mats Galbe; Guido Zacchi
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2013-10-08       Impact factor: 6.040

10.  Physical and chemical differences between one-stage and two-stage hydrothermal pretreated hardwood substrates for use in cellulosic ethanol production.

Authors:  Andrew Guilliams; Sivakumar Pattathil; Deidre Willies; Matt Richards; Yunqiao Pu; Sindhu Kandemkavil; Erin Wiswall
Journal:  Biotechnol Biofuels       Date:  2016-02-03       Impact factor: 6.040

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.