Literature DB >> 18025508

PET/CT of esophageal cancer: its role in clinical management.

John F Bruzzi1, Reginald F Munden, Mylene T Truong, Edith M Marom, Bradley S Sabloff, Gregory W Gladish, Revathy B Iyer, Tin-Su Pan, Homer A Macapinlac, Jeremy J Erasmus.   

Abstract

Positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT) has important utility and limitations in the initial staging of esophageal cancer, evaluation of response to neoadjuvant therapy, and detection of recurrent malignancy. Esophageal cancer is often treated by using a combined modality approach (chemotherapy, radiation therapy, and esophagectomy); correct integration of PET/CT into the conventional work-up of esophageal cancer requires a multidisciplinary approach that combines the information from PET/CT with results of clinical assessment, diagnostic CT, endoscopic gastroduodenoscopy, and endoscopic ultrasonography. PET/CT has limited utility in T staging of esophageal cancer and relatively limited utility in detection of dissemination to locoregional lymph nodes. However, PET/CT allows detection of metastatic disease that may not be identifiable with other methods. PET/CT is not sufficiently reliable in the individual patient for determination of treatment response in the primary tumor. Interpretation of PET/CT results is optimized by understanding the diagnostic limitations and pitfalls that may be encountered, together with knowledge of the natural history of esophageal cancer and the staging and treatment options available. RSNA, 2007

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18025508     DOI: 10.1148/rg.276065742

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiographics        ISSN: 0271-5333            Impact factor:   5.333


  30 in total

1.  Positron emission tomography-computed tomography of esophageal adenocarcinoma with vascular invasion and tumor thrombus.

Authors:  Jason Wachsmann; Umesh Oza; Hamid Latifi
Journal:  Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent)       Date:  2011-10

2.  Accuracy of PET-CT in predicting survival in patients with esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Claire Brown; Ben Howes; Glyn G Jamieson; Dylan Bartholomeusz; Urs Zingg; Thomas R Sullivan; Sarah K Thompson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  The role of integrated F-18-FDG-PET scanning in the detection of M1 disease in oesophageal adenocarcinoma and impact on clinical management.

Authors:  Soumil Vyas; Sheraz R Markar; Lydia Iordanidou; Samantha Read; David Stoker; Majid Hashemi; Ian Mitchell; Mark Winslet; Jamshed Bomanji
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Positron emission tomography's changing significance in the treatment of esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Shane Hopkins; Gary Yang
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2009-10-15

5.  Oesophageal cancer: can imaging improve its assessment?

Authors:  Giovanni Lucignani
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  A study about different findings of PET-CT between neoadjuvant and non-neoadjuvant therapy: SUVmax is not a reliable predictor of lymphatic involvement after neoadjuvant therapy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Jae Kil Park; Jae Jun Kim; Seok Whan Moon
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 2.895

7.  Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Aine Sakurada; Taro Takahara; Thomas C Kwee; Tomohiro Yamashita; Seiji Nasu; Tomohiko Horie; Marc Van Cauteren; Yutaka Imai
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-01-27       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 8.  State-of-the-art molecular imaging in esophageal cancer management: implications for diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment.

Authors:  Jolinta Lin; Seth Kligerman; Rakhi Goel; Payam Sajedi; Mohan Suntharalingam; Michael D Chuong
Journal:  J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-02

Review 9.  Proposed follow up programme after curative resection for lower third oesophageal cancer.

Authors:  L H Moyes; J E Anderson; M J Forshaw
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2010-09-04       Impact factor: 2.754

10.  Detection of lymph node metastases with ultrasmall superparamagnetic iron oxide (USPIO)-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in oesophageal cancer: a feasibility study.

Authors:  B B Pultrum; E J van der Jagt; H L van Westreenen; H M van Dullemen; P Kappert; H Groen; J Sietsma; M Oudkerk; J Th M Plukker; G M van Dam
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2009-04-06       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.