Literature DB >> 18025408

Effective treatment with oral sulfonylureas in patients with diabetes due to sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) mutations.

Meena Rafiq1, Sarah E Flanagan, Ann-Marie Patch, Beverley M Shields, Sian Ellard, Andrew T Hattersley.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Neonatal diabetes can result from mutations in the Kir6.2 or sulfonylurea receptor 1 (SUR1) subunits of the ATP-sensitive K(+) channel. Transfer from insulin to oral sulfonylureas in patients with neonatal diabetes due to Kir6.2 mutations is well described, but less is known about changing therapy in patients with SUR1 mutations. We aimed to describe the response to sulfonylurea therapy in patients with SUR1 mutations and to compare it with Kir6.2 mutations. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We followed 27 patients with SUR1 mutations for at least 2 months after attempted transfer to sulfonylureas. Information was collected on clinical features, treatment before and after transfer, and the transfer protocol used. We compared successful and unsuccessful transfer patients, glycemic control before and after transfer, and treatment requirements in patients with SUR1 and Kir6.2 mutations.
RESULTS: Twenty-three patients (85%) successfully transferred onto sulfonylureas without significant side effects or increased hypoglycemia and did not need insulin injections. In these patients, median A1C fell from 7.2% (interquartile range 6.6-8.2%) on insulin to 5.5% (5.3-6.2%) on sulfonylureas (P = 0.01). When compared with Kir6.2 patients, SUR1 patients needed lower doses of both insulin before transfer (0.4 vs. 0.7 units x kg(-1) x day(-1); P = 0.002) and sulfonylureas after transfer (0.26 vs. 0.45 mg x kg(-1) x day(-1); P = 0.005).
CONCLUSIONS: Oral sulfonylurea therapy is safe and effective in the short term in most patients with diabetes due to SUR1 mutations and may successfully replace treatment with insulin injections. A different treatment protocol needs to be developed for this group because they require lower doses of sulfonylureas than required by Kir6.2 patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18025408     DOI: 10.2337/dc07-1785

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  90 in total

Review 1.  Permanent neonatal diabetes due to activating mutations in ABCC8 and KCNJ11.

Authors:  Emma L Edghill; Sarah E Flanagan; Sian Ellard
Journal:  Rev Endocr Metab Disord       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.514

2.  Age at the time of sulfonylurea initiation influences treatment outcomes in KCNJ11-related neonatal diabetes.

Authors:  Brian W Thurber; David Carmody; Elizabeth C Tadie; Ashley N Pastore; Jazzmyne T Dickens; Kristen E Wroblewski; Rochelle N Naylor; Louis H Philipson; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2015-04-17       Impact factor: 10.122

3.  Dominant missense mutations in ABCC9 cause Cantú syndrome.

Authors:  Magdalena Harakalova; Jeske J T van Harssel; Paulien A Terhal; Stef van Lieshout; Karen Duran; Ivo Renkens; David J Amor; Louise C Wilson; Edwin P Kirk; Claire L S Turner; Debbie Shears; Sixto Garcia-Minaur; Melissa M Lees; Alison Ross; Hanka Venselaar; Gert Vriend; Hiroki Takanari; Martin B Rook; Marcel A G van der Heyden; Folkert W Asselbergs; Hans M Breur; Marielle E Swinkels; Ingrid J Scurr; Sarah F Smithson; Nine V Knoers; Jasper J van der Smagt; Isaac J Nijman; Wigard P Kloosterman; Mieke M van Haelst; Gijs van Haaften; Edwin Cuppen
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-05-18       Impact factor: 38.330

Review 4.  Neonatal Diabetes Mellitus: An Update on Diagnosis and Management.

Authors:  Michelle Blanco Lemelman; Lisa Letourneau; Siri Atma W Greeley
Journal:  Clin Perinatol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 3.430

Review 5.  Type 2 diabetes and obesity: genomics and the clinic.

Authors:  Mary E Travers; Mark I McCarthy
Journal:  Hum Genet       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 4.132

6.  No beta cell desensitisation after a median of 68 months on glibenclamide therapy in patients with KCNJ11-associated permanent neonatal diabetes.

Authors:  D Iafusco; C Bizzarri; F Cadario; R Pesavento; G Tonini; S Tumini; V Cauvin; C Colombo; R Bonfanti; F Barbetti
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2011-08-07       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  A successful transition to sulfonylurea treatment in male infant with neonatal diabetes caused by the novel abcc8 gene mutation and three years follow-up.

Authors:  Dragan Katanic; Ivana Vorgučin; Andrew Hattersley; Sian Ellard; Jayne A L Houghton; Dragana Obreht; Marija Knežević Pogančev; Jovan Vlaški; Danijela Pavkov
Journal:  Diabetes Res Clin Pract       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 5.602

8.  Diagnosis and treatment of neonatal diabetes: a United States experience.

Authors:  Julie Støy; Siri Atma W Greeley; Veronica P Paz; Honggang Ye; Ashley N Pastore; Kinga B Skowron; Rebecca B Lipton; Fran R Cogen; Graeme I Bell; Louis H Philipson
Journal:  Pediatr Diabetes       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 4.866

9.  RNA processing and mRNA surveillance in monogenic diabetes.

Authors:  Jonathan M Locke; Lorna W Harries
Journal:  Gene Regul Syst Bio       Date:  2008-05-21

10.  Referral rates for diagnostic testing support an incidence of permanent neonatal diabetes in three European countries of at least 1 in 260,000 live births.

Authors:  A S Slingerland; B M Shields; S E Flanagan; G J Bruining; K Noordam; A Gach; W Mlynarski; M T Malecki; A T Hattersley; S Ellard
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  2009-06-05       Impact factor: 10.122

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.