C Maletzki1, M Linnebacher, B Kreikemeyer, J Emmrich. 1. Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Internal Medicine, University of Rostock, Ernst-Heydemann-Str. 6, D-18055 Rostock, Germany. Claudia.Maletzki@uni-rostock.de
Abstract
BACKGROUND: This study addressed the potential of bacteriolytic therapy using Streptococcus pyogenes in a syngeneic pancreatic carcinoma mouse model. METHODS: Panc02 tumours were either infected with S pyogenes or were treated with the equivalent volume of vehicle. In addition to assessment of tumour histology and immunohistochemistry, isolated splenocytes were analysed by flow cytometry. Interferon (IFN) gamma secretion as a reaction of splenocytes against tumour cells was shown through the ELISpot technique. A cytotoxic effect of lymphocytes against tumour targets was detected by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. Cytokine levels in serum were measured. RESULTS: A single application of live bacteria into established Panc02 tumours resulted in complete tumour regression. This antitumoral effect was accompanied by massive leucocyte infiltration into the tumours as well as a significant and sustained elevation of systemic levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IFN gamma, tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6. Lymphocytes obtained from treated mice specifically recognised syngeneic tumour cells in IFN gamma-ELISpot, and most importantly in cellular cytotoxicity assays, indicating a tumour-specific immune response. CONCLUSIONS: We provide data that both the direct lytic activity of S pyogenes towards tumour cells and the infection-driven infiltration of tumours by cells of the innate immune system lead to damage of tumour cells followed by a dissemination of tumour components. This last outcome allows for the activation of tumour-specific effector cells, most probably in draining lymph nodes, promoted by the proinflammatory context. Taken together, these data indicate that the application of live S pyogenes may be a promising new treatment strategy for advanced pancreatic cancer patients that warrants further investigation.
BACKGROUND: This study addressed the potential of bacteriolytic therapy using Streptococcus pyogenes in a syngeneic pancreatic carcinomamouse model. METHODS: Panc02 tumours were either infected with S pyogenes or were treated with the equivalent volume of vehicle. In addition to assessment of tumour histology and immunohistochemistry, isolated splenocytes were analysed by flow cytometry. Interferon (IFN) gamma secretion as a reaction of splenocytes against tumour cells was shown through the ELISpot technique. A cytotoxic effect of lymphocytes against tumour targets was detected by lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) release. Cytokine levels in serum were measured. RESULTS: A single application of live bacteria into established Panc02 tumours resulted in complete tumour regression. This antitumoral effect was accompanied by massive leucocyte infiltration into the tumours as well as a significant and sustained elevation of systemic levels of the proinflammatory cytokines IFN gamma, tumour necrosis factor alpha and interleukin 6. Lymphocytes obtained from treated mice specifically recognised syngeneic tumour cells in IFN gamma-ELISpot, and most importantly in cellular cytotoxicity assays, indicating a tumour-specific immune response. CONCLUSIONS: We provide data that both the direct lytic activity of S pyogenes towards tumour cells and the infection-driven infiltration of tumours by cells of the innate immune system lead to damage of tumour cells followed by a dissemination of tumour components. This last outcome allows for the activation of tumour-specific effector cells, most probably in draining lymph nodes, promoted by the proinflammatory context. Taken together, these data indicate that the application of live S pyogenes may be a promising new treatment strategy for advanced pancreatic cancerpatients that warrants further investigation.
Authors: William W Tseng; Daniel Winer; Justin A Kenkel; Okmi Choi; Alan H Shain; Jonathan R Pollack; Randy French; Andrew M Lowy; Edgar G Engleman Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2010-06-09 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Brittany L Bunch; Krithika N Kodumudi; Ellen Scott; Jennifer Morse; Amy Mackay Weber; Anders E Berglund; Shari Pilon-Thomas; Joseph Markowitz Journal: Cancer Immunol Immunother Date: 2020-06-18 Impact factor: 6.968
Authors: Claudia Maletzki; Michael Gock; Ulrike Klier; Ernst Klar; Michael Linnebacher Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2010-07-28 Impact factor: 5.742
Authors: Elizabeth C Little; Cindy Wang; Patricia M Watson; Dennis K Watson; David J Cole; E Ramsay Camp Journal: J Surg Res Date: 2011-11-10 Impact factor: 2.192
Authors: Kaitlin M Dailey; JuliAnne E Allgood; Paige R Johnson; Mackenzie A Ostlie; Kambri C Schaner; Benjamin D Brooks; Amanda E Brooks Journal: Future Microbiol Date: 2021-03-23 Impact factor: 3.165