Literature DB >> 18024871

Costs and cost-effectiveness of a low-intensity patient-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Veena Shankaran1, June M McKoy, Neal Dandade, Narissa Nonzee, Cara A Tigue, Charles L Bennett, Tom D Denberg.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) screening is the most underused evidence-based cancer screening test in the United States. Few studies have reported the cost-effectiveness of CRC screening promotional efforts. In a recent randomized controlled trial, a patient-directed intervention for average-risk patients who had been referred for screening colonoscopy led to a 12% increase in CRC screening rates. The objective of this secondary analysis is to assess the cost-effectiveness of this intervention. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients in the intervention arm received a customized mailed brochure that included a reminder to schedule a screening colonoscopy and general information about CRC, the importance of CRC screening, and how to prepare for the procedure. The end point was completion of screening colonoscopy. The costs and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of this patient-directed intervention were derived. Sensitivity analyses were based on varying the costs of labor and supplies.
RESULTS: Rates of CRC screening for the intervention (n = 386 patients) versus control (n = 395) arms were 71% and 59%, respectively (P = .001). The total cost of the intervention was $1,927 and the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $43 per additional patient screened ($38 to $47 in a sensitivity analysis).
CONCLUSION: An intervention based on mailing a customized brochure to patients who were referred for a screening colonoscopy improved CRC screening rates at a university-based general medicine clinic. This intervention was comparable in effectiveness and cost-effectiveness to a similar recently reported low-intensity patient-directed CRC screening intervention, and markedly more affordable and cost-effective than a previously reported physician-directed CRC screening promotion intervention.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18024871     DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2007.13.4098

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0732-183X            Impact factor:   44.544


  20 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of patient mailings to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Thomas D Sequist; Calvin Franz; John Z Ayanian
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.983

2.  Implementation and Evaluation of a Novel Colorectal Cancer Decision Aid Using a Centralized Delivery Strategy.

Authors:  Channing E Tate; Daniel D Matlock; Alexandra F Dalton; Lisa M Schilling; Alexandra Marcus; Tiffany Schommer; Corey Lyon; Carmen L Lewis
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2018-04-25

3.  Colorectal cancer screening brochure for Latinos: focus group evaluation.

Authors:  Julia L Cooperman; Elizaveta Efuni; Cristina Villagra; Katherine DuHamel; Lina Jandorf
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2013-09       Impact factor: 2.037

4.  Staffing time required to increase cancer-screening rates through telephone support.

Authors:  Christina M Robinson; Michael L Beach; Mary Ann Greene; Andrea Cassells; Jonathan N Tobin; Allen J Dietrich
Journal:  J Ambul Care Manage       Date:  2010 Apr-Jun

5.  Knowledge and social engagement change in intention to be screened for colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yamile Molina; Katherine J Briant; Janeth I Sanchez; Mary A O'Connell; Beti Thompson
Journal:  Ethn Health       Date:  2017-01-24       Impact factor: 2.772

6.  Cost-effectiveness of a standard intervention versus a navigated intervention on colorectal cancer screening use in primary care.

Authors:  David R Lairson; Melissa Dicarlo; Ashish A Deshmuk; Heather B Fagan; Randa Sifri; Nora Katurakes; James Cocroft; Jocelyn Sendecki; Heidi Swan; Sally W Vernon; Ronald E Myers
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 6.860

7.  Costs and cost effectiveness of a health care provider-directed intervention to promote colorectal cancer screening.

Authors:  Veena Shankaran; Thanh Ha Luu; Narissa Nonzee; Elizabeth Richey; June M McKoy; Joshua Graff Zivin; Alfred Ashford; Rafael Lantigua; Harold Frucht; Marc Scoppettone; Charles L Bennett; Sherri Sheinfeld Gorin
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 44.544

8.  Randomized, controlled trial of a multimodal intervention to improve cancer screening rates in a safety-net primary care practice.

Authors:  Samantha Hendren; Paul Winters; Sharon Humiston; Amna Idris; Shirley X L Li; Patricia Ford; Raymond Specht; Stephen Marcus; Michael Mendoza; Kevin Fiscella
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2013-07-02       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Two controlled trials to determine the effectiveness of a mailed intervention to increase colon cancer screening.

Authors:  Carmen L Lewis; Alison Tytell Brenner; Jennifer M Griffith; Charity G Moore; Michael P Pignone
Journal:  N C Med J       Date:  2012 Mar-Apr

10.  Improving fecal occult blood testing compliance using a mailed educational reminder.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Lee; Veronica Reis; Shanglei Liu; Lorraine Conn; Erik J Groessl; Theodore G Ganiats; Samuel B Ho
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.