BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gradation of high-grade intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis poses a challenge to noninvasive neurovascular imaging, which seems critical for angioplasty in the ICA segments C1 and C5. We investigated cutoff values of intracranial ICA stenosis for transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) and compared this method with the "gold standard," digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients (mean age, 58.9 +/- 13.8 years) with intracranial ICA lesions were prospectively examined by using TCCS and DSA. Two standard TCCS coronal imaging planes were used to evaluate the intracranial ICA. In addition, a control group of 128 volunteers without cerebrovascular disease (mean age, 48.8 +/- 15.9 years) was investigated to establish standard velocity values. RESULTS: DSA confirmed 96 stenoses and 8 occlusions of the intracranial ICA in the study population. In 9% and 7% of cases, stenosis confined to the C1 or C5 segment was >50% and 70%, respectively. Receiver-operating curves demonstrated cutoff values for >70% stenosis in C1 when the peak systolic velocity (PSV) was >200 cm/s (specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 71%) or the C1/submandibular ICA index was >3 (specificity, 93%; sensitivity, 86%). CONCLUSIONS: TCCS is a reliable adjunctive method to detect and quantify significant stenosis of the intracranial ICA. The assessment of the C1/ICA index and peak systolic velocities maximizes the diagnostic accuracy of C1 stenosis to >70% when extracranial ICA stenosis coexists. Further studies need to be performed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of MR angiography and TCCS with that of DSA.
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Gradation of high-grade intracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) stenosis poses a challenge to noninvasive neurovascular imaging, which seems critical for angioplasty in the ICA segments C1 and C5. We investigated cutoff values of intracranial ICA stenosis for transcranial color-coded sonography (TCCS) and compared this method with the "gold standard," digital subtraction angiography (DSA). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty patients (mean age, 58.9 +/- 13.8 years) with intracranial ICA lesions were prospectively examined by using TCCS and DSA. Two standard TCCS coronal imaging planes were used to evaluate the intracranial ICA. In addition, a control group of 128 volunteers without cerebrovascular disease (mean age, 48.8 +/- 15.9 years) was investigated to establish standard velocity values. RESULTS: DSA confirmed 96 stenoses and 8 occlusions of the intracranial ICA in the study population. In 9% and 7% of cases, stenosis confined to the C1 or C5 segment was >50% and 70%, respectively. Receiver-operating curves demonstrated cutoff values for >70% stenosis in C1 when the peak systolic velocity (PSV) was >200 cm/s (specificity, 100%; sensitivity, 71%) or the C1/submandibular ICA index was >3 (specificity, 93%; sensitivity, 86%). CONCLUSIONS: TCCS is a reliable adjunctive method to detect and quantify significant stenosis of the intracranial ICA. The assessment of the C1/ICA index and peak systolic velocities maximizes the diagnostic accuracy of C1 stenosis to >70% when extracranial ICA stenosis coexists. Further studies need to be performed to compare the diagnostic accuracies of MR angiography and TCCS with that of DSA.
Authors: Scott E Kasner; Marc I Chimowitz; Michael J Lynn; Harriet Howlett-Smith; Barney J Stern; Vicki S Hertzberg; Michael R Frankel; Steven R Levine; Seemant Chaturvedi; Curtis G Benesch; Cathy A Sila; Tudor G Jovin; Jose G Romano; Harry J Cloft Journal: Circulation Date: 2006-01-23 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Michael P Marks; Joan C Wojak; Firas Al-Ali; Mahesh Jayaraman; Mary L Marcellus; John J Connors; Huy M Do Journal: Stroke Date: 2006-02-23 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Elena López-Cancio; Laura Dorado; Mónica Millán; Silvia Reverté; Anna Suñol; Anna Massuet; María Mataró; Amparo Galán; Maite Alzamora; Guillem Pera; Pere Torán; Antoni Dávalos; Juan F Arenillas Journal: BMC Neurol Date: 2011-02-17 Impact factor: 2.474
Authors: Sylvia Thurn; Katharina Kleinschmidt; Irena Kovacic; Christina Wendl; Ralf A Linker; Selim Corbacioglu; Felix Schlachetzki Journal: Neurol Res Pract Date: 2022-04-04