Literature DB >> 18023571

Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Elena Orsenigo1, Saverio Di Palo, Andrea Vignali, Carlo Staudacher.   

Abstract

The goal of this review is to outline some of the important surgical issues surrounding the management of patients with low rectal cancer submitted to laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (ISR). Surgery for rectal cancer continues to develop towards the ultimate goals of improved local control and overall survival, maintaining quality of life, and preserving sphincter, genitourinary, and sexual function. Nevertheless, all progress in the development of oncologic therapy (i.e., radiation and chemotherapy), radical surgical removal of the tumour is the only chance for permanent cure of rectal cancer. Beside this main objective, the preservation of faecal continence is the second-most important goal to reach an acceptable quality of life with preservation of sphincter function. Information concerning the depth of tumour penetration through the rectal wall, lymph node involvement, and presence of distant metastatic disease is of crucial importance when planning a curative rectal cancer resection. Preoperative staging is used to determine the indication for neoadjuvant therapy as well as the indication for local excision versus radical cancer resection. In appropriate patients, minimally invasive procedures, such as local excision, TEM, and laparoscopic resection with ISR allow for improved patient comfort, shorter hospital stays, and earlier return to preoperative activity level. Data from small, non-randomized studies evaluating laparoscopic ISR suggest that this procedure is feasible by experienced surgeons. A literature search identified five studies [Uchikoshi F, Nishida T, Ueshima S, Nakahara M, Matsuda H. Laparoscope-assisted anal sphincter-preserving operation preceded by transanal procedure. Tech Coloprocto 2006;10:5-9; Bretagnol F, Rullier E, Couderc P, Rullier A, Saric J. Technical and oncological feasibility of laparoscopic total mesorectal excision with pouch coloanal anastomosis for rectal cancer. Colorectal Disease 2003;5:451-3; Rullier E, Sa Cunha A, Couderc P, Rullier A, Gontier R, Saric J. Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection with coloplasty and coloanal anastomosis for mid and low rectal cancer. British Journal of Surgery 2003;90:445-51; Watanabe M, Teramoto T, Hasegawa H, Kitajima M. Laparoscopic ultralow anterior resection combined with per anum intersphincteric rectal dissection for lower rectal cancer. Diseases of the Colon and Rectum 2000;43(Suppl. 10):S94-7; Miyajima N, Yamakawa T. Laparoscopic surgery for early rectal carcinoma. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 1999;100:801-5]. The aim was to find those studies that documented potential clinical application of laparoscopic ISR. These studies concluded that a laparoscopic approach can be considered in most patients with low rectal cancer in which laparoscopic ISR represents a feasible alternative to conventional open surgery. Hopefully, randomized controlled trials, which utilize these alternative procedures, will in future determine the results of laparoscopic ISR in terms of sphincter function, faecal continence, disease free and overall survival. The reviewed studies concluded that high quality and less invasive surgery could be achieved if ISR and laparoscopic surgery were combined.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18023571     DOI: 10.1016/j.suronc.2007.10.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0960-7404            Impact factor:   3.279


  14 in total

1.  Superiority of laparoscopic rectal surgery: Towards a new era.

Authors:  Yosuke Fukunaga
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-27

2.  Is laparoscopic colorectal cancer surgery equal to open surgery? An evidence based perspective.

Authors:  Beat M Künzli; Helmut Friess; Shailesh V Shrikhande
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-04-27

3.  Laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Sang Woo Lim; Jung Wook Huh; Young Jin Kim; Hyeong Rok Kim
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Nerve supply to the internal anal sphincter differs from that to the distal rectum: an immunohistochemical study of cadavers.

Authors:  Yusuke Kinugasa; Takashi Arakawa; Gen Murakami; Mineko Fujimiya; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Hospital variation in sphincter preservation for elderly rectal cancer patients.

Authors:  Christopher M Dodgion; Bridget A Neville; Stuart R Lipsitz; Deborah Schrag; Elizabeth Breen; Michael J Zinner; Caprice C Greenberg
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  2014-03-22       Impact factor: 2.192

6.  Robot-assisted intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: technique and short-term outcome for 29 consecutive patients.

Authors:  Quor M Leong; Dong N Son; Jae S Cho; Se J Baek; Jung M Kwak; Azali H Amar; Seon H Kim
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopic resection of lower rectal cancer with telescopic anastomosis without abdominal incisions.

Authors:  Shi-Yong Li; Gang Chen; Jun-Feng Du; Guang Chen; Xiao-Jun Wei; Wei Cui; Fu-Yi Zuo; Bo Yu; Xing Dong; Xi-Qing Ji; Qiang Yuan
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 5.742

8.  Factors affecting sphincter-preserving resection treatment for patients with low rectal cancer.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Sun; Xianbo Yu; Haijiang Wang; Ming Ma; Zeliang Zhao; Qisan Wang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2015-06-05       Impact factor: 2.447

9.  Laparoscopic Approach for Primary Colorectal Cancer Improves Outcome of Patients Undergoing Combined Open Hepatic Resection for Liver Metastases.

Authors:  Francesca Ratti; Marco Catena; Saverio Di Palo; Carlo Staudacher; Luca Aldrighetti
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 3.352

10.  Video. Advantages of the laparoscopic approach for intersphincteric resection.

Authors:  Madoka Hamada; Tomonori Matsumura; Tomoko Matsumoto; Fuminori Teraishi; Kazuhide Ozaki; Toshio Nakamura; Yasuo Fukui; Yutaka Nishioka; Toshikatu Taniki; Tadashi Horimi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-12-04       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.