OBJECTIVE: CD34 is a sialomucin often expressed by cells with hemangiopoietic potential and widely serves as a surrogate marker of stem cell potential. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) also express CD34, although the functional significance of its expression remains undefined. In this study, we determined whether CD34(pos) MSCs are functionally distinct from CD34(null) MSCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MSCs derived from C57Bl/6 mice were transduced to express the green fluorescent protein (GFP) from which pure CD34(pos) MSC and CD34(null) MSC clones were selected. In vitro, clones were examined by microarray analysis, while in vivo subcutaneous implantation of matrix-embedded MSCs was used to assess cell survival, differentiation, and neovascularization. RESULTS: The flow cytometric phenotype of CD34(pos) and CD34(null) MSCs were similar, as was gene expression of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) A and B. However, CD34(pos) MSCs upregulated a number of supplementary angiogenesis-associated genes and showed a greater expression of gene associated with vascular differentiation. At 15 days postimplantation, cell survival between CD34(pos) and CD34(null) MSCs was similar, however, CD34(pos) MSCs evoked a significantly greater host-derived response (4.2 +/- 0.7 vs 1.9 +/- 0.5 x 10(6) cells; p < 0.05). GFP-expressing CD34(pos) MSC implants acquired significantly more CD31 expression compared to CD34(null) MSC cells (10.7% +/- 8.4% vs 3.1% +/- 0.6%; p < 0.05), as well as a significantly greater host-derived endothelial cell influx (CD31(+)/CD45(-)). CONCLUSION: CD34 expression by MSCs correlates with enhanced vasculogenic and angiogenic potential in vivo.
OBJECTIVE:CD34 is a sialomucin often expressed by cells with hemangiopoietic potential and widely serves as a surrogate marker of stem cell potential. Mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) also express CD34, although the functional significance of its expression remains undefined. In this study, we determined whether CD34(pos) MSCs are functionally distinct from CD34(null) MSCs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: MSCs derived from C57Bl/6 mice were transduced to express the green fluorescent protein (GFP) from which pure CD34(pos) MSC and CD34(null) MSC clones were selected. In vitro, clones were examined by microarray analysis, while in vivo subcutaneous implantation of matrix-embedded MSCs was used to assess cell survival, differentiation, and neovascularization. RESULTS: The flow cytometric phenotype of CD34(pos) and CD34(null) MSCs were similar, as was gene expression of vascular endothelial growth factors (VEGFs) A and B. However, CD34(pos) MSCs upregulated a number of supplementary angiogenesis-associated genes and showed a greater expression of gene associated with vascular differentiation. At 15 days postimplantation, cell survival between CD34(pos) and CD34(null) MSCs was similar, however, CD34(pos) MSCs evoked a significantly greater host-derived response (4.2 +/- 0.7 vs 1.9 +/- 0.5 x 10(6) cells; p < 0.05). GFP-expressing CD34(pos) MSC implants acquired significantly more CD31 expression compared to CD34(null) MSC cells (10.7% +/- 8.4% vs 3.1% +/- 0.6%; p < 0.05), as well as a significantly greater host-derived endothelial cell influx (CD31(+)/CD45(-)). CONCLUSION:CD34 expression by MSCs correlates with enhanced vasculogenic and angiogenic potential in vivo.
Authors: Jennifer Whiteley; Ryszard Bielecki; Mira Li; Shawn Chua; Michael R Ward; Nobuko Yamanaka; Duncan J Stewart; Robert F Casper; Ian M Rogers Journal: Stem Cell Rev Rep Date: 2014-06 Impact factor: 5.739
Authors: Yue Wang; Aaron M Abarbanell; Jeremy L Herrmann; Brent R Weil; Mariuxi C Manukyan; Jeffrey A Poynter; Daniel R Meldrum Journal: PLoS One Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Hannah M Hodgkiss-Geere; David J Argyle; Brendan M Corcoran; Bruce Whitelaw; Elspeth Milne; Bennett David; Sally A Argyle Journal: Int J Stem Cells Date: 2011-11 Impact factor: 2.500