OBJECTIVE: Patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation is considered important yet not widely practiced. This study explored stakeholder beliefs about patient participation in performance indicator selection to better understand hypothesized barriers. METHODS: Interviews with 30 cancer patients and health professionals from two teaching hospitals were analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: All groups believed patients, not members of the public, should be involved in the selection of indicators. Ongoing, interactive methods such as committee involvement, rather than single, passive efforts such as surveys were preferred. Health professionals recommended patients assume a consultative, rather than decision-making role. Older patients agreed with this. CONCLUSION: Variable patient interest, health professional attitudes, and a lack of insight on appropriate methods may be limiting patient involvement in this, and other service planning and evaluation activities. More research is required to validate expressed views among the populations these stakeholders represent, and to establish effective methods for engaging patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to encourage a change in health professional attitude may be required, along with dedicated organizational resources, coordinators and training. Methods to engage patients should involve deliberation, which can be achieved through modified Delphi panel or participatory research approaches.
OBJECTIVE:Patient involvement in health service planning and evaluation is considered important yet not widely practiced. This study explored stakeholder beliefs about patient participation in performance indicator selection to better understand hypothesized barriers. METHODS: Interviews with 30 cancerpatients and health professionals from two teaching hospitals were analyzed qualitatively. RESULTS: All groups believed patients, not members of the public, should be involved in the selection of indicators. Ongoing, interactive methods such as committee involvement, rather than single, passive efforts such as surveys were preferred. Health professionals recommended patients assume a consultative, rather than decision-making role. Older patients agreed with this. CONCLUSION: Variable patient interest, health professional attitudes, and a lack of insight on appropriate methods may be limiting patient involvement in this, and other service planning and evaluation activities. More research is required to validate expressed views among the populations these stakeholders represent, and to establish effective methods for engaging patients. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Efforts to encourage a change in health professional attitude may be required, along with dedicated organizational resources, coordinators and training. Methods to engage patients should involve deliberation, which can be achieved through modified Delphi panel or participatory research approaches.
Authors: Daniel Cukor; Lewis M Cohen; Elizabeth L Cope; Nasrollah Ghahramani; S Susan Hedayati; Denise M Hynes; Vallabh O Shah; Francesca Tentori; Mark Unruh; Jeanette Bobelu; Scott Cohen; Laura M Dember; Thomas Faber; Michael J Fischer; Rani Gallardo; Michael J Germain; Donica Ghahate; Nancy Grote; Lori Hartwell; Patrick Heagerty; Paul L Kimmel; Nancy Kutner; Susan Lawson; Lisa Marr; Robert G Nelson; Anna C Porter; Phillip Sandy; Bruce B Struminger; Lalita Subramanian; Steve Weisbord; Bessie Young; Rajnish Mehrotra Journal: Clin J Am Soc Nephrol Date: 2016-05-19 Impact factor: 8.237
Authors: Monica C Robotin; Sandra C Jones; Andrew V Biankin; Louise Waters; Don Iverson; Helen Gooden; Bruce Barraclough; Andrew G Penman Journal: Cancer Causes Control Date: 2010-01-14 Impact factor: 2.506