OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) as used in routine clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have shown that DES prevent target vessel revascularization in selected patients, but whether this translates into superior outcomes, compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), for the full spectrum of patients treated with DES in North America is unknown. METHODS: Patients in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry enrolled in 2004 who received at least 1 DES (n = 1,460) were compared with 1,763 patients enrolled in the recruitment period immediately preceding the approval of DES (2001 to 2002) who received at least 1 BMS. RESULTS: Patients receiving DES more often had diabetes mellitus and less often presented with an acute myocardial infarction (MI). At 1 year, cumulative death and MI was 7.6% in DES- and 8.7% in BMS-treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 1.15; p = 0.34). The 1-year rate of target vessel revascularization was 5.0% in DES and 9.2% in BMS patients (p < 0.001), and the risk of any repeat revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass was lower in DES patients (adjusted HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.60; p < 0.001). Patients with both simple and complex lesion characteristics benefited from DES with lower risk of repeat target vessel revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention compared with BMS (any complex lesion: adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.83; absence of any complex lesion: adjusted HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71). The 1-year incidence of stent thrombosis was 1.0% in DES patients. CONCLUSIONS: The generalized use of DES resulted in better outcomes than BMS, with fewer clinically driven revascularization procedures and similar rates of death and MI at 1 year.
OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effectiveness and safety of drug-eluting stents (DES) as used in routine clinical practice. BACKGROUND: Randomized trials have shown that DES prevent target vessel revascularization in selected patients, but whether this translates into superior outcomes, compared with bare-metal stents (BMS), for the full spectrum of patients treated with DES in North America is unknown. METHODS:Patients in the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Dynamic Registry enrolled in 2004 who received at least 1 DES (n = 1,460) were compared with 1,763 patients enrolled in the recruitment period immediately preceding the approval of DES (2001 to 2002) who received at least 1 BMS. RESULTS:Patients receiving DES more often had diabetes mellitus and less often presented with an acute myocardial infarction (MI). At 1 year, cumulative death and MI was 7.6% in DES- and 8.7% in BMS-treated patients (adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 0.88, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.68 to 1.15; p = 0.34). The 1-year rate of target vessel revascularization was 5.0% in DES and 9.2% in BMS patients (p < 0.001), and the risk of any repeat revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary bypass was lower in DES patients (adjusted HR 0.38, 95% CI 0.25 to 0.60; p < 0.001). Patients with both simple and complex lesion characteristics benefited from DES with lower risk of repeat target vessel revascularization by percutaneous coronary intervention compared with BMS (any complex lesion: adjusted HR 0.57, 95% CI 0.39 to 0.83; absence of any complex lesion: adjusted HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.28 to 0.71). The 1-year incidence of stent thrombosis was 1.0% in DES patients. CONCLUSIONS: The generalized use of DES resulted in better outcomes than BMS, with fewer clinically driven revascularization procedures and similar rates of death and MI at 1 year.
Authors: Hazem Al Muradi; Aditya Mehra; Joseph Okolo; Helen Vlachos; Faith Selzer; Oscar C Marroquin; Kimberly Skelding; Elizabeth M Holper; David O Williams; J Dawn Abbott Journal: Cardiovasc Revasc Med Date: 2012 Nov-Dec
Authors: Samip Vasaiwala; Helen Vlachos; Faith Selzer; Oscar Marroquin; Suresh Mulukutla; J Dawn Abbott; David O Williams Journal: Am J Cardiol Date: 2012-07-03 Impact factor: 2.778
Authors: Jerome J Federspiel; Sally C Stearns; Ron T van Domburg; Brett C Sheridan; Jennifer L Lund; Patrick W Serruys Journal: EuroIntervention Date: 2011-03 Impact factor: 6.534
Authors: Laura Mauri; Treacy S Silbaugh; Robert E Wolf; Katya Zelevinsky; Ann Lovett; Zheng Zhou; Frederic S Resnic; Sharon-Lise T Normand Journal: Circulation Date: 2008-10-13 Impact factor: 29.690
Authors: Jamal S Rana; Lakshmi Venkitachalam; Faith Selzer; Suresh R Mulukutla; Oscar C Marroquin; Warren K Laskey; Elizabeth M Holper; Vankeepuram S Srinivas; Kevin E Kip; Sheryl F Kelsey; Richard W Nesto Journal: Diabetes Care Date: 2010-06-02 Impact factor: 17.152