Literature DB >> 18021216

Classification of radical hysterectomy adopted by the Gynecological Cancer Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer.

F Mota1, I Vergote, J B Trimbos, F Amant, N Siddiqui, A Del Rio, R Verheijen, P Zola.   

Abstract

The Piver classification of radical hysterectomy for the treatment of cervical cancer is outdated and misused. The Surgery Committee of the Gynecological Cancer Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) produced, approved, and adopted a revised classification. It is hoped that at least within the EORTC participating centers, a standardization of procedures is achieved. The clinical indications of the new classification are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2007        PMID： 18021216     DOI： 10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01138.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer        ISSN： 1048-891X            Impact factor:   3.437


  7 in total

Review 1.  Nerve-sparing radical hysterectomy compared to standard radical hysterectomy for women with early stage cervical cancer (stage Ia2 to IIa).

Authors:  Chumnan Kietpeerakool; Apiwat Aue-Aungkul; Khadra Galaal; Chetta Ngamjarus; Pisake Lumbiganon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2019-02-12

Review 2.  Urological complications after treatment of cervical cancer.

Authors:  Esther M K Wit; Simon Horenblas
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2014-01-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Type II or type III radical hysterectomy compared to chemoradiotherapy as a primary intervention for stage IB2 cervical cancer.

Authors:  Vivek Nama; Georgios Angelopoulos; Jeremy Twigg; John B Murdoch; Jo Bailey; Theresa A Lawrie
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-10-12

4.  Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy.

Authors:  F Marin; M Pleşca; C I Bordea; S C Voinea; I Burlănescu; E Ichim; C G Jianu; R R Nicolăescu; M P Teodosie; K Maher; A Blidaru
Journal:  J Med Life       Date:  2014-03-25

5.  Does the extension of the type of hysterectomy contribute to the local control of endometrial cancer?

Authors:  Tetsuya Hasegawa; Megumi Furugori; Kazumi Kubota; Mikiko Asai-Sato; Aiko Yashiro-Kawano; Hisamori Kato; Yuka Oi; Hiroyuki Shigeta; Keiko Segawa; Masakazu Kitagawa; Yuko Mine; Haruya Saji; Reiko Numazaki; Yasuyo Maruyama; Emi Ohnuma; Hanako Taniguchi; Ken Sugiura; Etsuko Miyagi; Tatsuya Matsunaga
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Impact of examined lymph node number on lymph node status and prognosis in FIGO stage IB-IIA cervical squamous cell carcinoma: A population-based study.

Authors:  Jiahui Yong; Baicheng Ding; Yaqin Dong; Mingwei Yang
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-09-20       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Predictors of complications in gynaecological oncological surgery: a prospective multicentre study (UKGOSOC-UK gynaecological oncology surgical outcomes and complications).

Authors:  R Iyer; A Gentry-Maharaj; A Nordin; M Burnell; R Liston; R Manchanda; N Das; R Desai; R Gornall; A Beardmore-Gray; J Nevin; K Hillaby; S Leeson; A Linder; A Lopes; D Meechan; T Mould; S Varkey; A Olaitan; B Rufford; A Ryan; S Shanbhag; A Thackeray; N Wood; K Reynolds; U Menon
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 7.640
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.