Literature DB >> 18021119

Assessment of the ethical review process in Sudan.

Dya Eldin M Elsayed1, Nancy E Kass.   

Abstract

The ethical review process is an important component of contemporary health research worldwide. Sudan started an ethical review process rather late in comparison with other countries. In this study, we evaluate the structure and functions of existing ethics review committees. We also explore the knowledge and attitudes of Sudanese researchers toward the ethical review process and their experience with existing ethics review committees. There are four ethics review committees in the country; these committees have no institutional regulations to govern their functions. Furthermore, Sudan also lacks national guidelines. Ethical reviews are carried out primarily for studies seeking international funding and are almost always governed by the funding agencies' requirements. Nearly half of respondents (46.3%) knew about the existence of research ethics committees in Sudan. Researchers reported a variety of experiences with the ethical review process; most of them were unable to define 'ethics committee'.

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18021119     DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8847.2006.00163.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dev World Bioeth        ISSN: 1471-8731            Impact factor:   2.294


  7 in total

1.  Awareness of Jordanian Investigators About the Importance of Ethics Review Committees: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Abeer M Rababa'h; Karem H Alzoubi; Mera Ababneh; Omar F Khabour
Journal:  Sci Eng Ethics       Date:  2019-09-30       Impact factor: 3.525

2.  Knowledge, Awareness, and Attitudes about Research Ethics among Dental Faculty in the Middle East: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Hadir F El-Dessouky; Amr M Abdel-Aziz; Chadi Ibrahim; Malini Moni; Reham Abul Fadl; Henry Silverman
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2011-07-03

3.  Mention of ethical review and informed consent in the reports of research undertaken during the armed conflict in Darfur (2004-2012): a systematic review.

Authors:  Ghaiath Hussein; Khalifa Elmusharaf
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Performance of IRBs in China: a survey on IRB employees and researchers' experiences and perceptions.

Authors:  Xing Liu; Ying Wu; Min Yang; Yang Li; Kaveh Khoshnood; Esther Luo; Lun Li; Xiaomin Wang
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2022-08-29       Impact factor: 2.834

5.  Research ethics review in humanitarian contexts: the experience of the independent ethics review board of Médecins Sans Frontières.

Authors:  Doris Schopper; Ross Upshur; Francine Matthys; Jerome Amir Singh; Sunita Sheel Bandewar; Aasim Ahmad; Els van Dongen
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 11.069

6.  Democracy: the forgotten challenge for bioethics in the developing countries.

Authors:  Ghaiath M A Hussein
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2009-05-22       Impact factor: 2.652

7.  Research ethics policies and practices in health research institutions in sub-Saharan African countries: results of a questionnaire-based survey.

Authors:  Chris Zielinski; Derege Kebede; Peter Ebongue Mbondji; Issa Sanou; Wenceslas Kouvividila; Paul-Samson Lusamba-Dikassa
Journal:  J R Soc Med       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 5.344

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.