Literature DB >> 18021106

Best Guess method for age-based weight estimation in paediatric emergencies: validation and comparison with current methods.

Michelle T Thompson1, Michael J Reading, Jason P Acworth.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: During paediatric resuscitation, drug doses are calculated based upon weight. Age-based weight estimates are used when weighing children is impractical. The average weight of Australian children has increased, and widely used paediatric age-based formulae might underestimate weight. A modified age-based method for paediatric weight calculation, the 'Best Guess', has been described.
OBJECTIVE: To validate the Best Guess formulae on a new population of paediatric emergency patients, and to compare the accuracy of this method with Advanced Paediatric Life Support (APLS) and Australian Resuscitation Council (ARC) formulae for age-based weight calculations.
METHODS: A retrospective study was performed of Australasian Triage Scale (ATS) category 1 or 2 patients presenting to a tertiary paediatric ED over a 12 month period. Calculated weights using each method (APLS, ARC and Best Guess) were compared with true weights for infants (<1 year), preschool-aged (1-4 years) and school-aged (5-14 years) children. Mean actual error and mean percentage error for each was calculated.
RESULTS: A total of 1843 patient weights were included in the study. The Best Guess Infant formula accurately estimated weight (mean percentage error +4.2%). The Best Guess formulae more accurately estimated weight than both APLS and ARC formulae for both preschool-aged children (mean percentage error +2.6% vs-12.1% vs-12.1%) and school-aged children (mean percentage error +7.7% vs-19.9% vs-12.4%).
CONCLUSION: The Best Guess formulae is a valid method for age-based weight estimation in acutely unwell or injured children presenting to the ED and more accurately predicts mean weight than either APLS or ARC formulae.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18021106     DOI: 10.1111/j.1742-6723.2007.01031.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med Australas        ISSN: 1742-6723            Impact factor:   2.151


  7 in total

1.  Validation of an improved pediatric weight estimation strategy.

Authors:  Susan M Abdel-Rahman; Nichole Ahlers; Anne Holmes; Krista Wright; Ann Harris; Jaylene Weigel; Talita Hill; Kim Baird; Marla Michaels; Gregory L Kearns
Journal:  J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2013-04

2.  Accuracy of nelson and best guess formulae in estimation of weights in nigerian children population.

Authors:  A O Omisanjo; A E Orimadegun; F O Akinbami
Journal:  Ann Ib Postgrad Med       Date:  2014-12

3.  Accuracy of estimation of total body weight by legs and head weight measuring and comparison method in the anesthetized patients.

Authors:  Ebrahim Nasiri; Reza Nasiri
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2013 Sep-Dec

Review 4.  The accuracy of emergency weight estimation systems in children-a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Mike Wells; Lara Nicole Goldstein; Alison Bentley
Journal:  Int J Emerg Med       Date:  2017-09-21

5.  Validation of Pediatric Weight Estimation Formulae in a Suburban Cameroonian Population: A Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Clarence Mvalo Mbanga; Valirie Ndip Agbor; Chobufo Ditah; Louise Daniele Toukam; Tsi Njim
Journal:  J Trop Pediatr       Date:  2019-02-01       Impact factor: 1.165

6.  Is weight just a number? The accuracy of UK ambulance paediatric weight guidance - findings from a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Karl Charlton; Matt Capsey; Chris Moat
Journal:  Br Paramed J       Date:  2020-12-01

7.  Is the APLS formula used to calculate weight-for-age applicable to a Trinidadian population?

Authors:  Khalid Ali; Ian Sammy; Paula Nunes
Journal:  BMC Emerg Med       Date:  2012-08-02
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.